decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Romney's Office: We Are Firm and Expect No Changes
Wednesday, December 28 2005 @ 10:20 AM EST

There is a cowardly report in The Boston Globe today about Peter Quinn's resignation, in which the same journalist who stirred up the bogus accusations against Peter Quinn reports on his resignation without once mentioning the Globe's involvement. (For a more complete report, try ZDNET.)

The article does mention that Quinn was completely exonerated after an investigation, but it doesn't mention that it was the Globe that made it all happen in the first place. I will quote a snip from the report, however, because you'd want to know about this part:

Eric Fehrnstrom, director of communications for Governor Mitt Romney, yesterday confirmed that Quinn had submitted his resignation, effective Jan. 12. Fehrnstrom, however, rebutted Quinn's strong implication that the administration was backing away from the recommendations, issued on Aug. 31 and announced by former Administration and Finance Secretary Eric Kriss, that the executive branch was moving toward open format software.

''We are moving steadily towards that deadline and we expect no changes in those rules," Fehrnstrom said. Under the Aug. 31 initiative, the state would require all documents produced by the state's executive branch to be stored in a new, universal computer format, called OpenDocument.

Since this statement comes from Romney's spokesman, I'd say it is meaningful. If Massachusetts backed away now from its decision, not only would many reputations in the Commonwealth be sullied, and in this case rightly so, but the stain on Microsoft would be unerasable. All this happened, after all, because Microsoft refused to do the right thing and support ODF like everybody else. And because it has some heavy-handed backers in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts who played hard ball in a particularly ugly way, and unjustly smeared the good name of a decent and honest man, who understood technology better than they do and who wanted nothing but good for the citizens he served. He found a way to ensure that their documents would belong to them and their children and grandchildren in perpetuity, that no one would have to pay a single vendor or be forced into expensive upgrades just to read their own documents someday. That is all he did. And look what happened next.

If the friends of Microsoft in the Commonwealth thought they were helping Microsoft by attacking Peter Quinn, I'd say they miscalculated. The Peter Quinn story makes Microsoft look bad, and the Commonwealth even worse. Haven't you heard, fellows? This is the Internet age. Every dirty trick gets to be known and reported, with the light firmly shining on it, not by mainstream media folks perhaps, some of whom will print any old dirt you send them without even verifying if it's true or not, but by bloggers, by citizen journalists. And there are millions of us.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )