decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
EU MS: Judge Hubert Legal Is Kicked Off the Case
Friday, July 08 2005 @ 11:51 PM EDT

Well, they did it. Judge Hubert Legal has been kicked off the Microsoft EU antitrust case. The Reuters report says it's because he angered his fellow judges by writing an article saying some clerks were trying to unduly influence the outcome of cases. A 13-man panel, headed by Bo Vesterdorf, will now hear the case:

But Judge Hubert Legal, who had been in charge of a panel of five judges handling the case, will no longer participate, the court official said. Sources have said Legal was removed, because he wrote a controversial article that angered fellow judges.

Vesterdorf had proposed a change in judges after Judge Legal created an uproar by writing a piece that used the words "ayatollahs of free enterprise" in connection with law clerks and suggested they might have undue influence on some judges.

The European Commission found in March 2004 that Microsoft competed unfairly against rivals, fined it 497 million euros ($605 million) and ordered it to change some of its business practices.

Now the 13-judge panel will decide whether to uphold the Commission's decision or reject all or part of it.

It seems any time there is a finding of Microsoft guilt in an antitrust matter, some way or other, a judge is sacrificed.

Vesterdorf heads the panel, or chamber, but Judge John Cook will handle the case now. If you wish to read a snip of the article that cost Judge Legal his oversight, I wrote about it here, and there is a bit of it translated for you, and there's a link if you wish to buy and read the whole thing (in French only). Background here in an earlier Reuters report. For the life of me, I read the article and I can't see what the fuss is about. It can't be just the article, unless there are some very thin-skinned prima donna judges in Europe.

Or whiny law clerks throwing their weight around and influencing judges. Oh, wait. . .


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )