decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Declaration of David S. Stone, SCO v. AZ, as text
Saturday, June 11 2005 @ 11:44 PM EDT

This is the Declaration of David S. Stone [PDF], one of SCO's Boies, Schiller attorneys, listing all the exhibits that SCO's Report Regarding Discovery Pursuant to the Order of the Court Dated August 6, 2004 [PDF] references. If you wish to see it in context, here's the complete 91-page Report with exhibits [PDF], which we earlier commented on. Our thanks go once again to Laomedon for the transcript. The exhibits will be posted next, individually.



*****************************************

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

THE SCO GROUP, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation.

Plaintiff,

v.

AUTOZONE, INC.,
a Nevada corporation,

Defendant.

Case Number: CV-S-04-0237-RCJ-LRL

DECLARATION OF DAVID S. STONE

David S. Stone declares as follows:

1. I am a partner with Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Counsel for The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO") in this matter and submit this declaration in support of the Report of Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc. Regarding Discovery Pursuant to the Order of the Court Dated August 6, 2004.

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the Bob Celmer deposition transcript.

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the November 24, 2004 Letter from David J. Stewart to David S. Stone.

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the January 11, 2005 e-mail from David J. Stewart to David S Stone.

5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the relevant pages of the James Greer deposition transcript.

1

6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the relevant pages of the March 4, 2005 Letter from Douglas L. Bridges to David S. Stone.

7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the relevant pages of Defendant AutoZone, Inc.'s Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents.

I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I am aware that if any of the foregoing statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment.

___[signature]___
David S. Stone

DATED this 27th day of May, 2005

2


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )