Well, here comes SCO, asking for more time again. It seems they are very busy preparing discovery responses. They don't know busy. Wait until they get all that code they asked for dumped on them. Here's their plea for two more weeks to answer IBM's Motion For Entry of Order Limiting Scope of IBM's Ninth Counterclaim, SCO's Motion and Memorandum for Extension to File Response [PDF]. They say they are asking for "an additional two-week period". Not to be petty, but they are actually asking for 15 days, from March 8 to March 23.
****************************
Brent O. Hatch (5715)
Mark F. James (5295)
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE
[address, phone, fax]
Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice)
Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice)
Sean Eskovicz (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
[address, phone, fax]
Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice)
Mark J. Heise (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
[address, phone, fax]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
| THE
SCO GROUP, Inc.
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MACHINES CORPORATION,
Defendant.
|
MOTION AND MEMORANDUM FOR
EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSE
Case No. 2:03CV0294DAK
Hon. Dale A. Kimball
Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells
|
Plaintiff, The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO") hereby moves the Court for an Order extending the deadline for SCO to respond to IBM's Motion For Entry of Order Limiting Scope of IBM's Ninth Counterclaim from March 8, 2005 to March 23, 2005.
As grounds for this Motion, SCO seeks an additional two week period for SCO to respond due to SCO's workload of preparing discovery responses and other matters currently at issue in the litigation. Counsel sought a stipulation to this extension from counsel for IBM, but such accommodation was refused.
SCO submits herewith a proposed Order reflecting the relief sought.
DATED this 4th day of March, 2005.
By: ___[signature]___
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C>
Mark F. James
BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
Robert Silver
Stuart Singer
Edward Normand
Sean Eskovitz
Counsel for Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Plaintiff, The SCO Group, Inc., hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's Motion and Memorandum for Extension to File Response was served on Defendant International Business Machines Corporation on this 4th day of March, 2005, by U.S. Mail to:
Alan L. Sullivane, Esq.
Todd Shaughnessy, Esq.
Snell & Wilmenr L.L.P.
[address]
Evan R. Chesler, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
[address]
Donald J. Rosenberg, Esq.
[address]
__[signature]___
|
