decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Yarro et al Accused by Canopy of Siphoning Off $20 Million
Saturday, January 29 2005 @ 11:06 AM EST

Bob Mims is at it again, and this time it's the scoop of scoops. Ralph Yarro, Darcy Mott and Brent Christensen are suing Canopy Group over "unlawful ouster" from their jobs there, and Canopy Group -- the Noorda family and William Mustard -- are countersuing, charging them with "siphoning off at least $20 million via 'a series of self-dealing and wasteful transactions.'" The lawsuits are filed in Provo's 4th District Court. Both sides claim the other took advantage of the elderly Noordas.    

Can you imagine how fascinating the discovery in this case will be?


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )