decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Novell Hearing Reset to February 1st in SCO v. Novell
Wednesday, December 29 2004 @ 11:11 AM EST

The hearing set for January on Novell's Motion to Dismiss in SCO v. Novell has been rescheduled for February 1st at 3:00. I know some of you were planning on attending on January 20, so be aware that there is no hearing on that date. Here are the clerk's notations:

11/16/04 - 60 Notice of Hearing filed : Motion hearing set for 3:00
1/20/05 for [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint
To be held before Judge Kimball cc:atty ( Ntc generated
by: KJ) (blk) [Entry date 11/16/04]

12/28/04 - 61 Notice of Hearing filed : Motion hearing reset for 3:00
2/1/05 for [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint
To be held before Judge Kimball cc:atty ( Ntc generated
by: KJ) (blk) [Entry date 12/28/04]

No. I don't know why. There are some filings in SCO v. IBM also.

Update:

Here is the order.

In SCO v. IBM, SCO filed a Renewed Motion to Compel Discovery on December 23rd. What a coincidence. Just when some puffery shows up in the media embedded in an otherwise balanced article, hinting at secret things filed and SCO's discovery motion and their last chance in the courts, we find a filing about discovery. Another SCO filing about discovery.

SCO filed their memorandum in support as a sealed document, despite allying with G2 in their alleged quest for openness.

There is also this docket entry:

Docket Text: Substitution Exhibit 19 filed by plaintiff SCO Grp RE: [348-1] declaration of Jeremy O. Evans

That exhibit to the Evans declaration would be David Frasure's Deposition, the 1992 deposition in the BSDi case, the 200+ page PDF. His declaration in the current case is here. The documents are not yet on file electronically on Pacer, but as soon as they are, we'll have a clearer picture of what it all means. It's not wise to reach conclusions based only on a docket entry, as we've seen before. Sometimes there are notations in error. So we'll wait and see.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )