decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Motions for Today's Hearing
Tuesday, October 19 2004 @ 09:21 AM EDT

There are two motions to be heard by Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells today, as I understand it, IBM's Motion to Strike the 7/12/04 Declaration of Christopher Sontag and SCO's Motion to Compel Discovery. It's a bit complex, so I thought another nice chart might help. Credit for this one goes to Loguar, who did the heavy lifting for us, using the chart format I used for the last hearing. SCO filed a Motion Regarding Discovery, IBM responded and then SCO filed a Reply Memorandum and in support of it, they filed the Sontag declaration. IBM then filed a motion to strike. The chart includes all the filings, for context.

This is for overview, and I don't guarantee it's 100% comprehensive. If you see any errors, do post them, so I can make any adjustments, but this is what I believe is the material being argued today. We did our best to be accurate within the confines of time available for the task. The chart is taken from the Pacer history of the case, so you can cross-check for accuracy yourself, and if there are any elements that don't match, Pacer would be authoritative. Even that isn't the dernier cri, because there could be last-minute activity we just don't know about.



****************************

IBM Motion to Strike

        • SCO: #287 Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Discovery [Sealed];
          #288 Declaration of Jeremy O. Evans [Sealed];
          #289 Declaration of Barbara L. Howe [Sealed];

              • IBM: #304 Memorandum in Opposition to SCO's Supplemental Memorandum re Discovery [Sealed]
              • #305 Declaration of Ron Saint Pierre [Sealed]
                #306 Declaration of David Bullis [Sealed]
                • SCO: #316 Reply Brief Supplemental Memo re Discovery Documents [Sealed];
                  #317 Declaration of Jeremy O. Evans re brief reply [Sealed];


SCO Renewed Motion to Compel


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )