decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
SCO & Novell Stipulate to Oct. 1 Deadline for SCO to File Reply -- as text
Saturday, September 25 2004 @ 03:16 AM EDT

Another Stipulation by Novell and SCO, giving SCO more time, until October 1, to file their memorandum in opposition to Novell's 2nd Motion to Dismiss.

News about IBM also on Pacer, but no document yet:

IBM 303 - Memorandum by Intl Bus Mach Inc in opposition to [299-1] ex parte emergency motion for a scheduling conference, [281-1] expedited motion to enforce the Court's Amended Scheduling Order Dated June 10, 2004 (ce) [Entry date 09/24/04]



**********************************************

Brent O. Hatch (5715)
Mark F. James (5295)
Mark R. Clements (7172)
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
[address, phone, fax]

Robert Silver, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
[address, phone, fax]

Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice)
Mark J. Heise (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP
[address, phone, fax]

Attorneys for Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc.

____________________

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

_______________________________________

THE SCO GROUP, INC.,

a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff

vs.

NOVELL, INC.,

a Delaware corporation,

Defendant

_____________________________________

STIPULATION

Case No. 2:04CV00139
Judge: Dale A. Kimball

____________________________________

Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO"), by and through its counsel, and Defendant Novell, Inc. ("Novell"), by and through its counsel, hereby stipulate that SCO may have up to and including October 1, 2004 in which to file an opposition memorandum in opposition to Novell's Second Motion to Dismiss. A proposed Order is filed herewith.

Dated this 23rd day of September, 2004.

By: ____[signature]______
Heather M. Sneddon
ANDERSON & KARRENBERG

Attorneys for Defendant Dates this 24th day of September, 2004

By: ____[signature]______
Mark F. James
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE

Attorneys for Plaintiff


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 24th day of September, 2004, I caused to be mailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing via first class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, to the following:

Thomas R. Karrenberg
John P. Mullen
Heather M. Sneddon
ANDERSON & KARRENBERG
[address]

Michael A. Jacobs
Matthew I. Kreeger
MORRISON & FOERSTER
[address]

____[signature]____


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )