decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
AutoZone Hearing Set for September 9
Friday, September 03 2004 @ 03:25 PM EDT

With the usual warnings that we shouldn't assume Pacer is necessarily correct, they have an entry that says there will be a hearing for AutoZone's Emergency Motion for a Stay for September 9 at 10 AM:

"#38 - hrng on Emergency mtn to stay 9#37) is set for 9/9/04 @10am bfr RCJ crtrm 7D. cpys dist."

It's likely a typo, obviously, but not my typo, so I am recording it as is, but it probably means to say that the hearing will be on No: 37, which is AutoZone's Emergency Motion to Stay number. So if any of you can attend and let us know how it goes, that would be lovely. It would be wise to call the courthouse first, to verify time and date before you make the trip, including on the morning of the hearing.




  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )