decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Novell Hearing Will Not Be on September 15th - Set in Error
Thursday, September 02 2004 @ 04:17 AM EDT

The Novell Hearing, set for the 15th of September at 2:00, has been vacated. No new time set. Evidently, as we thought might be the case, there was an error in the notice of hearing. Pacer has the clerk's notation like this:

9/1/04 45 Notice of VACATED Hearing filed : Hearing set for 9/15/04 at 2:00 p.m. set in error therefore is VACATED cc:atty (Ntc generated by: BK) (blk) [Entry date 09/01/04]

This is why I always say you can't go just by what you see on Pacer. We contacted the court, and they were surprised to learn that both the IBM and the Novell hearings were scheduled for the same time period. Obviously, it wasn't intended that way.

On the IBM front, SCO has been granted permission to file their overlength memorandum regarding their Motion to Compel Discovery. And on oral arguments on IBM, Pacer records this:

8/27/04 262 - Notice of Hearing filed : Motion hearing set for 2:30 12/9/04 for [233-1] motion for partial summary judgment on its counterclaim for copyright infringement (eighth counterclaim), set for 2:30 12/9/04 for [225-1] motion for partial summary judgment on Breach of Contract Claims. (Oral Argument Requested) To be held before Judge Kimball cc:atty ( Ntc generated by: KJ) (blk) [Entry date 08/27/04]

9/1/04 268 Notice of Hearing filed : Motion hearing set for 2:00 9/15/04 for [152-1] cross motion for partial summary judgment on claim for declaratory judgment of non-infringement, set for 2:00 9/15/04 for [144-1] amended motion to Dismiss To be held before Judge Kimball cc:atty ( Ntc generated by: KJ) (blk) [Entry date 09/01/04]

This makes more sense. Be aware some of the links may take a few minutes to resolve properly.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )