decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
DaimlerChrysler Motion to Strike - as text
Monday, July 19 2004 @ 07:19 PM EDT

Here's DaimlerChrysler's Motion to Strike Certain Paragraphs of the Affidavit of William Broderick as text. If all the paragraphs they are requesting be struck, there is nothing of substance left. To verify that for yourself, here is the Broderick Affidavit.

********************************

STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

____________________________

THE SCO GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,

Defendant.

____________________________

Civil Action No. 04-056587-CKB

Honorable Rae Lee Chabot

____________________________

Joel H. Serlin (P20224)
Barry M. Rosenbaum (P26487)
SEYBURN, KAHN, GINN, BESS AND
SERLIN, P.C.
Attorneys for SCO
[address, phone]

James P. Feeney (P13335)
Thomas S. Bishoff (P53753)
Stephen L. Tupper (P53918)
DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC
Attorneys for DaimlerChrysler Corporation
[address, phone]

____________________________

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION'S MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN
PARAGRAPHS OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM BRODERICK

_____________________________

DaimlerChrysler Corporation ("DCC"), through its counsel, Dykema Gossett PLLC, submits this motion to strike Paragraphs 8, 10-26, 28, 35, 44-45, 56-57, 59 and 62-65 of the Affidavit of William Broderick ("Broderick Affidavit") for failure to comply with MCR 2.119(B)(1) and MCR 2.116(G)(6) because the statements contained therein are not within the personal knowledge of the affiant.

In support of this Motion, DCC relies upon the facts and law set forth in its Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Strike Certain Paragraphs of the Affidavit of William Broderick, filed contemporaneously herewith, and its exhibits, the pleadings and other documents on file with the Court, and all matters of which the Court may take judicial notice.

WHEREFORE, Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation respectfully requests that this Court grant this Motion and enter an order, pursuant to MCR 2.119(B)(1) and MCR 2.116(G)(6) striking Paragraphs 8, 10-26, 28, 35, 44-45, 56-57, 59 and 62-65 of the Broderick Affidavit from the record.

Dated: June 30, 2004

Respectfully Submitted,

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC
______[signature]________
James P. Feeney (P13335)
Thomas S. Bishoff (P53753)
Stephen L. Tupper (P53918)

[address, phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
DaimlerChrysler Corporation

Of counsel

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
Mark G. Matuschak
Michelle D. Miller
[address, phone]

Robin L. Alperstein
[address, phone]


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )