decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
SCO Motion to Amend Scheduling Order - as text
Thursday, April 08 2004 @ 12:20 AM EDT

Here is SCO's Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order. Memorandum in Support will follow soon.

******************************************

Brent O. Hatch (5715)
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE
[address, phone, fax]

Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice)
Mark J. Heise (admitted pro hac vice)
David K. Markarian (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
[address, phone, fax]

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

______________________________________

The SCO GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MACHINES CORPORATION,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

PLAINTIFF SCO'S MOTION TO
AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. 2:03CV0294DAK

Judge Dale A. Kimball
Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells

____________________________________

Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO"), hereby moves this Court for an order amending the Scheduling Order in this matter. The grounds for this Motion are as follows:

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), SCO has moved to amend the Scheduling Order to extend certain deadlines in this case. Good cause exists to grant SCO's Motion because: (1) after the Scheduling Order was entered, IBM filed 10 counterclaims, including several claims for patent infringement; (2) discovery in this case was effectively stayed for four months; and (3) IBM's untimely responses to discovery have hindered orderly prosecution of the case.

This Motion is supported by a Memorandum in Support filed concurrently herewith.

DATED this 5th day of April, 2004.

Respectfully submitted,

____signature__________
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
Brent O. Hatch
Mark F. James

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, L.L.P.
Stephen N. Zack
Mark J. Heise
David K. Markarian


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Plaintiff, The SCO Group, Inc. hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER was served on Defendant International Business Machines Corporation on this 5th day of April, 2004, by U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid, on their counsel of record as indicated below:

Alan L. Sullivan, Esq.
Todd M. Shaughnessy, Esq.
Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
[address]

Evan R. Chesler, Esq.
David R. Marriott, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
[address]

Donald J. Rosenberg, Esq.
[address]

_______________[signature]_______________


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )