decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
IBM Granted Leave to Amend CounterClaims
Tuesday, March 30 2004 @ 12:50 AM EST

Now we're having fun. On the heels of SCO asking the court to please, please bifurcate the IBM patent counterclaims, Judge Kimball has signed an unopposed order granting IBM leave to amend their counterclaims. That means all of them, not just the patent counterclaims. And IBM gets to amend after having read SCO's motion to bifurcate. PDF is here.

********************************************

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

___________________________________________

THE SCO GROUP, INC.,

               Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,  

                                   v.     

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MACHINES CORPORATION,

          Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.  

   ___________________________________

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

Civil No. 2:03CV0294 DAK

Honorable Dale A. Kimball

Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells

__________________________________

Based on the Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to amend, and for good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff International Business Machines Corporation be and hereby is granted leave to amend its counterclaims.

Dated this 26th day of March, 2004.

BY THE COURT:

________signature_________
Honorable Dale A. Kimball
United States District Court Judge


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 26th day of March, 2004, a true and correct copy of the foregoing [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND was hand delivered to the following:

Brent O. Hatch
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
[address]

and sent by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, to the following:

Stephen N. Zack
Mark J. Heise
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
[address]

Kevin P. McBride
[address]

________signature_________


United States District Court
for the
District of Utah

* * CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF CLERK * *

Re: 2:03-cv-00294

True and correct copies of the attached were either mailed, faxed or e-mailed by the clerk to the following:

Brent O. Hatch, Esq.
HATCH JAMES & DODGE
[address]

Stephen Neal Zack, Esq.
BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER
[address]

David K. Markarian, Esq.
BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER
[address]

Mark J. Heise, Esq.
BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER
[address]

Scott E. Gant, Esq.
BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER
[address]

Evan R. Chesler, Esq.
CRAVATH SWAINE & MOORE
[address]

Thomas G. Rafferty, Esq.
CRAVATH SWAINE & MOORE
[address]

David R. Marriott, Esq.
CRAVATH SWAINE & MOORE
[address]

Mr. Alan L Sullivan, Esq.
SNELL & WILMER LLP
[address]

Todd M. Shaughnessy, Esq.
SNELL & WILMER LLP
[address]

Amy F. Sorenson, Esq.
SNELL & WILMER LLP
[address]

Mr. Kevin P McBride, Esq.
[address]


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )