IBM and SCO have jointly filed a stipulation and motion asking the court for an order giving IBM until the 26th to respond to SCO's Second Amended Complaint. I know. The suspense is killing me, too. While you're waiting, you might like to look at LWN's annotated SCO stock price chart. I am not a finance person, so I won't try to tell you what it means, but I found it fascinating.
*******************************************
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
Alan L. Sullivan (3152)
Todd M. Shaghnessy (6651)
[address, phone, fax]
CRAVATH SWAINE & MOORE
Evan R. Chesler (admitted pro hac vice)
David R. Marriott (7572)
[address, phone]
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff
International Business Machines Corporation
____________________________
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
____________________________
THE SCO GROUP, INC.,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,
vs.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MACHINES CORPORATION,
Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
__________________________
STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Civil No. 2:03CV0294 DAK
Honorable Dale A. Kimball
Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells
________________________
The parties, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and jointly move the Court for an Order enlarging the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. The parties agree that Defendant may have up to and including March 26, 2004, within which to respond to the Second Amended Complaint.
Dated this 19th day of March, 2004.
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
Alan L. Sullivan
Todd M. Shaughnessy
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE
Evan R. Chesler
David R. Marriott
By _____signature_____
Counsel for Defendant International
Business Machines Corporation
Dated this 19th day of March, 2004
HATCH JAMES & DODGE
Brent O. Hatch
Mark F. James
____(signature)_______
Counsel for Plaintiff
|