decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Novell Has Until March 26 to Answer Motion to Remand
Friday, March 19 2004 @ 02:20 PM EST

The lawyers for SCO and for Novell have filed a stipulation that Novell has until March 26 to respond to SCO's Motion to Remand. The PDF is here. Thanks go to Newsome and to LvilleDebugger for the speedy transcript.

**********************************************

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
Michael A. Jacobs, pro hac vice
Matthew I. Kreeger, pro hac vice
[address, phone, fax]

Paul Goldstein, pro hac vice
[address, phone]

ANDERSON & KARRENBERG
Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726
John P. Mullen, #4097
Heather M. Sneddon, #9520
[address, phone, fax]

Attorneys for Defendant Novell, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

_______________________________________

THE SCO Group, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff

vs.

NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendant

_____________________________________

STIPULATION

Case No. 2:04CV00139
Judge Dale A. Kimball

____________________________________

Defendant Novell, Inc., by and through its counsel, and Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc., by and through its counsel, hereby stipulate that Novell may have up to and including March 26, 2004 in which to file an opposition memorandum to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand.

DATED: March 18, 2004.

ANDERSON & KARRENBERG
_______[signature of Heather M. Sneddon]_____
Thomas R. Karrenberg
John P. Mullen
Heather M. Sneddon
Attorneys for Defendant Novell, Inc.

HATCH, JAMES & DODGE
_______[signature of Mark R. Clements]_______
Brent O. Hatch
Mark R. Clements
Attorneys for Plaintiff The SCO Group, Inc.


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this __18th__ day of March, 2004, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION to be served via first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following:

Brent O. Hatch
Mark R. Clements
HATCH JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
[ADDRESS]

Kevin P. McBride
[ADDRESS]

Stephen N. Zack
Mark J. Heise
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
[ADDRESS]

____[Heather M. Sneddon's SIGNATURE]____


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )