decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
SCO Files Answer to Red Hat's Request to Supplement the Record
Tuesday, February 24 2004 @ 04:04 AM EST

UPDATE: We've got the document now, and it is an Answer from SCO to Red Hat's Request to Supplement, not SCO filing to supplement. The notation in Pacer was misleading, which is why I always am reluctant to rely on just a Pacer listing. We should have the document as PDF ready later today, and then we'll transcribe. It's being scanned now.


Original story: According to Pacer, SCO may have followed Red Hat's example and also filed a Motion and Memorandum, requesting to supplement the record. Here is what is on Pacer, although I caution that clerks sometimes make mistakes in recording information, as we learned once before when a clerk recorded incorrectly that Mr. Markarian had been added as an attorney for IBM instead of for SCO, so this is subject to confirmation. The filing mentions a Memorandum of Law filed by the SCO Group, but it's possible it will turn out to be a response to Red Hat's Motion instead. The Pacer entry isn't altogether clear, but a volunteer will go by the courthouse tomorrow and find out:

2/19/04 31 Memorandum of Law Filed by SCO Group Inc. [30-1] motion To Supplement the Record - Reply Brief due 2/26/04 (ft) [Entry date 02/20/04]

Hopefully, we'll have it for you soon.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )