decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Notice of Filing Plaintiff's Exhibits for Use at Hearing on February 6, 2004
Thursday, February 05 2004 @ 11:54 PM EST

Here's the third document SCO filed on February 4, Notice of Filing Plaintiff's Exhibits for Use at Hearing on February 6, 2004. Again, we'll have to wait until we can get the attachments from the courthouse directly. The February 6th hearing is tomorrow. See you then.

Brent O. Hatch (5715)
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
[address, phone, fax]

Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice)
Mark J. Heise (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
[address, phone, fax]

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH


THE SCO GROUP,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MACHINES CORPORATION,

Defendant.

NOTICE OF FILING
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS
FOR USE AT HEARING
ON FEBRUARY 6, 2004


Case No. 03-CV-0294
Hon: Dale A. Kimball
Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells



Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, The SCO Group ("SCO"), hereby files the following exhibits for the court's use and consideration at the hearing on the matters set for hearing on February 6th, 2004:

1.    SCO's Source Log of documents that have been produced.
2.    IBM's Response to SCO's Request for Admissions.
3.    Spreadsheet listing documents sought in SCO's First Request for Production to IBM.
4.    SCO's Notice of Compliance and attached Declaration dated January 12, 2004

DATED this 4th day of February, 2004.

Respectfully submitted,

HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
Brent O. Hatch
Mark F. James

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, L.L.P.
Stephen N. Zack
Mark J. Heise
David K. Markarian

By: [signature]
Counsel for Plaintiff/Counterclaim defendant


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, The SCO Group, hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on Defendant International Business Machines Corporation on the 4th day of February 2004, by U.S. Mail to:

David Marriott, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
[address]

Donald J. Rosenberg, Esq.
[address]

and HAND-DELIVERED to:

Todd Shaughnessy, Esq.
Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
[address]

[signature]


Exhibits/ Attachments to this document have not been scanned.
Please see the case file.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )