decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Linus Digs Into Copyright Law and Notices Something Useful
Friday, December 05 2003 @ 01:52 PM EST

Linus must be getting over his revulsion at all things legal. He has put his brain to work on the law, and now that he's in Groklaw mode, he has found something beautifully useful and ironic at the same time. Look what he found, and yes, I am impressed:

"I ended up looking up the exact wording of the US copyright law for the definition of 'derivative', and guess what I find a few lines below it:

'The term "financial gain" includes receipt, or expectation of receipt, of anything of value, including the receipt of other copyrighted works.'


"This is from US Code Collection, Title 17 (copyrights), Chapter 1, Section 101: 'Definitions'. In short, this is from the very first section in copyright law - the thing that defines terms even before those terms are used. What I'm trying to say - this is some pretty fundamental stuff when it comes to copyrights in the US. Pertinent, if you will.

"And note how copyright law expressly includes 'the expectation of receipt' of anything of value, and expressly mentions 'receipt of other copyrighted works' as such a thing of value. And that's the _definition_ of 'financial gain' as far as copyright law is concerned.

"And guess what the GPL is all about? Maybe you can explain to Darl how the GPL is _designed_ so that people receive the value of other peoples copyrighted works in return for having made their own contributions. That is the fundamental idea of the whole license - everything else is just legal fluff.

"So . . . when he attacks the GPL as being somehow against 'financial gain', that notion that the GPL has of 'exchange of receipt of copyrighted works' is actually EXPLICITLY ENCODED in the US copyright law. It's not just a crazy idea that some lefty commie hippie dreamed up in a drug-induced stupor.

So if Darl calls that notion unconstitutional, he is actually attacking the US code as it stands today.

"If you want to check that legal quote yourself, the place to go is

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/101.html

"Ehh? Irony.

"Linus"

Linus is way cool.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )