decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Linus: What Subpoena? Update: He Just Got It
Wednesday, November 12 2003 @ 09:41 PM EST

As you probably heard, SCO is claiming that they sent subpoenas to Linus and the Pope. No, only kidding. But they do say they sent to the following:

"SCO said Wednesday that it has filed subpoenas with the U.S. District Court in Utah, targeting six different individuals or organizations. Those include Novell; Linus Torvalds, creator of the Linux kernel; Richard Stallman of the Free Software Foundation ; Stewart Cohen, chief executive of the Open Source Development Labs ; and John Horsley , general counsel of Transmeta.

"SCO spokesman Blake Stowell said he did not know what the subpoenas asked for, but 'I know that some of them have been served.'"

I checked with Linus, and he says he didn't get one yet. UPDATE He just got his subpoena. Served him during dinner.

I also checked with the courthouse. Nothing there.

Since there are no verifiable facts as of yet, and no, a Blake Stowell statement doesn't count as a fact with me, let's play make-believe. What if SCO saw Daniel Lyons' article in Forbes about the IBM subpoenas they served on BayStar and the analysts and decided to hastily do a copycat routine to get headlines back for themselves and attention away from BayStar and all that? You think? Say, how has that stock been doing, anyway? Oh, dearie me. Down to 14.73 at closing. I wonder what will happen tomorrow? Think it might go up?

You know, it isn't exactly normal to announce who you are going to subpoena. For one thing, the party might go on a 2-year world cruise on a raft or something, and then you might find them hard to timely serve. Not that I'm trying to give Linus any suggestions, of course. But a guy might just find himself pining for the fjords.

The whole thing just smells very, very odd. I wonder why reporters don't notice such things and ask Blake some obvious followup questions when they get these phone calls, like what do you think somebody else's lawyer is going to tell you? Then there is the math. They said six, but there are only five listed. I guess they don't teach math to journalism majors.


  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )