decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
SCO Files Motion To Extend Time to Amend, Add Parties
Tuesday, September 30 2003 @ 06:06 AM EDT

SCO has filed a motion with the court in Utah, filed on September 26 and entered on the 29th, a Motion asking for more time, until February 4, 2004, to amend their pleadings and add parties.

Your guess is as good as mine. It's not digitized yet, so the only way to know is to get a copy of the motion from the courthouse or wait. It's possible the motion doesn't specify much as to who they wish to add, just that they want to. But until February 4, 2004?!? That's a 4-month delay. Maybe they have a lot of parties to add? Maybe they are in no hurry to have this adjudicated? Or maybe they're being tutored in the GPL? That subject is hard for them to master, it seems, so here's hoping that's it.




  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )