decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


To read comments to this article, go here
Highlights of the IBM Filing
Friday, September 26 2003 @ 11:13 PM EDT

I will do a detailed explanation as soon as I can, but in the meanwhile, you can get a pdf of IBM's filing here. If you want the short version, read paragraphs 152 through 154 and the following relief section to the end.

What jumps off the page, aside from the copyright infringement counterclaim based on SCO's violation of the GPL, are paragraphs 33, 54, and 154.

In paragraph 33, IBM says:

"Indeed, SCO incorporated certain code licensed pursuant to the GPL into its proprietary Unix products."

Then in paragraph 154, they say they are entitled to the following relief, a declaration that:

". . . (3) any product into which SCO has incorporated code licensed pursuant to the GPL is subject to the GPL and SCO may not assert rights with respect to that code except as provided by the GPL."

Then in paragraph 54, IBM says SCO is asserting legal theories that are frivolous.

They covered all the bases. IBM has said to SCO all the things you wished someone would. I can't see one thing they could have used that they didn't use. It's a powerful document.

To be continued.




  View Printable Version


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )