decoration decoration

When you want to know more...
For layout only
Site Map
About Groklaw
Legal Research
ApplevSamsung p.2
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Gordon v MS
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
MS Litigations
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
OOXML Appeals
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v Novell
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

To read comments to this article, go here
Sun Comes Out From Behind the Clouds
Thursday, July 10 2003 @ 10:02 PM EDT

Well, gang, it's official. Sun is the 2nd licensee, just as we suspected. The very alert Stephen Shankland has an article here which clears up all doubt, which a reader "quatermass" brought to my attention:
The pact, signed earlier this year, expanded the rights Sun acquired in 1994 to use Unix in its Solaris operating system. But there's more to the relationship: SCO also granted Sun a warrant to buy as many as 210,000 shares of SCO stock at $1.83 per share as part of the licensing deal, according to a regulatory document filed Tuesday.
We reported here back on June 16, in "SCO's Quarterly Report: UNIX is Mine, All Mine", that the 2nd licensee had that perk, when I wrote in detail about the quarterly report:
In connection with one license agreement SCO says they "granted a warrant to the licensee to purchase up to 210,000 shares of our common stock, for a period of five years, at a price of $1.83 per share. This warrant has been valued, using the Black-Scholes valuation method, at $500,000. Because the warrant was issued for no consideration, $500,000 of the license proceeds have been recorded as warrant outstanding and the license revenue reduced accordingly."
Now that we know who it is, doesn't it make your stomach turn? No consideration? The only other question now is: did the two companies plan this whole thing from the start? We'll know when the code is identified. If it turns out to be Solaris code, that will indicate if the "Solaris trap" was deliberately baited.

There has always been an alertness and concern in the open source community that some proprietary company would try to sneak some code into GNU/Linux, just to create an opportunity to sue for infringement.

For example, aside from the warning about the Solaris Trap, there was another occasion when proprietary code was released, although in that case it was allegedly crackers breaking in to Microsoft and stealing it, back in 2000. I always did wonder about the truthfulness of that report and even if it were true, I wondered why Microsoft would reveal it to the press. Companies typically try to keep something like that quiet. FSF attorney Moglen immediately put out a statement, warning everyone not to accept any offers to even look at the MS code. For the same reason, programmers are advised not to participate in "shared source" or to sign any NDAs.

I am, obviously, making no allegations. Not now, not yet. But my eyes are wide open and I'll be watching. For one thing, it'll be interesting to see if Sun gets those 210,000 shares it has the right to, at $1.83. I'm guessing they will, and that that is why they have come out of the closet. How very foresightful to ask for such a right in a licensing deal back in February. Whatever could the parties to that deal have been basing that clause on, do ya suppose?

They might as well get in on the action. A lot of folks in this loathesome tale are making out like bandits. I'm going to create a SCO Stock buy and sell page, to keep a record. Happily, the SEC is public information. There is only so much hiding you can do from them.

Oh, one more thing in the Shankland piece. SCO says it is registering for copyrights. They say it will take six months, in order to prove they have the rights. One thing I know for sure. It isn't the Copyright Office that takes six months. Registering for a copyright can be done by getting the form over the internet in five minutes, plus a followup paper mailing. Your copyright is effective when they receive it if everything is in order. Maybe everything wasn't in order. The certificate may take 4 or 5 months to get sent to you, but you have the copyright immediately. Something isn't being said about this chain of ownership business. Maybe that explains the delay in announcing the new licensing plan. You can't sue for statutory damages under copyright law unless you have registered [PDF] prior to the infringement, among other advantages, as you can see on page 7 of this Copyright Office article, where it lists the advantages of registering, including these:

Among these advantages are the following:
  • Registration establishes a public record of the copyright claim.

  • Before an infringement suit may be filed in court, registration is necessary for works of U.S. origin.

  • If made before or within five years of publication, registration will establish prima facie evidence in court of the validity of the copyright and of the facts stated in the certificate.

  • If registration is made within three months after publication of the work or prior to an infringement of the work, statutory damages and attorney’s fees will be available to the copyright owner in court actions. Otherwise, only an award of actual damages and profits is available to the copyright owner.

  • Registration allows the owner of the copyright to record the registration with the U.S. Customs Service for protection against the importation of infringing copies....

Registration may be made at any time within the life of the copyright.

  View Printable Version

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )