|
|
| Novell's Motion for Audio of Hearing at 10th Circuit Ct. of Appeals Granted ~pj |
 |
|
Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 02:49 AM EDT
|
Novell applied at the end of May for audio of the oral argument before the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals May 6th in Novell's appeal in Novell v. Microsoft, the antitrust litigation over WordPerfect: Novell requests a copy of the oral argument recording so that it may be transcribed and referenced during the future course of Novell’s dispute with Appellee Microsoft Corp.
The court has granted the request, with an order saying both parties will be sent a copy. That isn't what Novell asked for. Microsoft didn't oppose the motion, but it didn't join it either. Novell asked: "Should the Court grant this request, the mp3 recording may be sent to Joshua I. Schiller" at Boies Schiller. The reason Novell gives for its request means, I gather, either that Novell expects to try to appeal to the US Supreme Court if it is not successful in its appeal at the Tenth Circuit; alternatively, it hopes the case will be remanded to Utah for the trial its appeal is asking for, and it wants the transcript for reference in that context. Either way, the story won't end here.
Here are the filings:
05/29/2013 - Open Document [10076418] Motion filed by Appellant Novell, Inc. to release the oral argument recording. Served on: 05/29/2013. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [12-4143] JIS
06/10/2013 - Open Document [10080162] Order filed by Judges Kelly, Gorsuch and Holmes granting Attorney motion to release oral argument recording. Served on 06/10/2013. [12-4143]
We are still waiting for the appeal court's decision. Say, a shout out to the parties: we'd love to publish the transcript, if you two can agree to allow it. Should you grant this request, the mp3 recording may be sent to pj at groklaw.net.
: ) Novell's motion is approved as to form for this type of motion, as you can see from the docket entry. The motion's page on compliance ("CERTIFICATE OF DIGITAL SUBMISSION AND PRIVACY REDACTIONS") says this: I certify that a copy of the foregoing APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF as submitted in Digital Form via the Court’s CM/ECF system is an exact copy of the written document filed with the Clerk and has been scanned for viruses. In addition, I certify that all required privacy redactions have been made. This isn't the opening brief, so I gather they just used a form that was in the computer without remembering to change the name of the document, but the court either didn't notice or didn't care. In any case, it tells you what the requirements are supposed to be.
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: frankieh on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 03:07 AM EDT |
..please put the correction in the title.
korrecshun -> correction[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: frankieh on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 03:08 AM EDT |
| NSA bared from this thread! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Go Forth on the 4th to Celebrate the Fourth - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 04:47 AM EDT
- Bared?? - Authored by: maroberts on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 05:53 AM EDT
- Oracle locking the stable after... - Authored by: complex_number on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 08:15 AM EDT
- Google Patents Walking stick with a camera - Authored by: complex_number on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 10:34 AM EDT
- Microsoft partners with Samsung, HP - Authored by: squib on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 11:42 AM EDT
- Boies on forthcoming Supreme Court Same-Sex Marriage Ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 02:09 PM EDT
- Monsanto wins Nobel Prize for agriculture .. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 05:04 PM EDT
- Microsoft-Nokia Advanced Talks Recently Broke Down - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 05:19 PM EDT
- How To Uninstall McAfee Antivirus by John McAfee himself - Authored by: squib on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 05:30 PM EDT
- A few articles a couple ago (court ruling Genes) Re: 2 grandmothers with cancer... News! - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 06:01 PM EDT
- US eyes prosecution of foreign cyber thieves - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 08:50 PM EDT
- Cumulus Networks unveils 'Cisco killer' - Authored by: JamesK on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 09:18 PM EDT
- long track record of pushing back - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 10:08 PM EDT
- DEC, Microsoft, Cutler and NT. Is it true? - Authored by: pgmer6809 on Thursday, June 20 2013 @ 02:33 AM EDT
| |
| Authored by: frankieh on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 03:10 AM EDT |
| newspicks & comments. Please add links [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: frankieh on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 03:11 AM EDT |
what he said.....
never been first before... oh the thrill![ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: esni on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 03:24 AM EDT |
'The court has granted the request, with an order saying both parties will be
sent a copy. That isn't what Novell asked for. '
But is it reasonable, that this should be available to both (or neither)?
Does it prejudice Novell in anyway that MS also gets the audio?
---
Eskild
Denmark
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
