decoration decoration

When you want to know more...
For layout only
Site Map
About Groklaw
Legal Research
ApplevSamsung p.2
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Gordon v MS
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
MS Litigations
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
OOXML Appeals
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v Novell
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Unix Books


Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

You won't find me on Facebook


Donate Paypal

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Can You Please Help With a Patent Demand Survey? ~ pj
Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:15 AM EDT

I found out some more details about the patent demand survey that Professor Colleen Chien of Santa Clara University is asking folks to fill out. First, the link didn't resolve properly in the previous article that mentioned it, so I've corrected it now, but I wanted to highlight it here also, in case you gave up earlier. If you go here, you can fill it out. [The survey is on that page. Scroll down and it begins with the word "Background".]

Second, what's a patent demand? It could be a letter demanding you license a patent or a threat of a lawsuit, that sort of thing.

Also, you don't have to be a CEO or head of a startup or a lawyer to provide useful information. If the company you work for has received a demand letter, or been sued by a non-practicing entity or anybody with a patent, you can fill out the form. If you are an app developer, you qualify. If you are a software developer, you qualify, even if your company isn't a tech company. Even if you've never had a demand made on you or your company, you can still fill out the form. The idea is to figure out what's going on in the patent world, particularly with small companies and entrepreneurs and startups. Are threats of patent litigation chilling innovation? If there is a problem, and it's widespread, they'd like to get more precise about it. So, it's inclusive.

If you can talk your boss into filling it out instead, that's fine, but make sure you don't both fill it out, to make certain the results are as accurate as possible. Only one person per company. I know there are probably victims of certain trolls out there, but don't list any such names of who made a demand on you or your company, just what happened, what the demand was, and all the other details the survey asks about.

It's anonymous, so don't give your name either, and nothing you say will be quoted unless you give permission, and if you have any questions, you can contact Professor Chien [].

Congress, I've just learned, is having hearings on patents this week, and as it happens Professor Chien is going to testify, so if you have information you'd like her to take with her, so to speak, this is your moment. The purpose of the survey, in other words, is to help frame policy recommendations, so it's important, if you care about patents, and I know a lot of you do. Just be sure to be accurate and precise.

Here are her exact instructions:

I'm a law professor conducting a survey of the impacts of patent demands, particularly on small companies and entrepreneurs. If you handle legal disputes (for example as a solo app developer or person who is familiar with the legal issues your company experiences), please complete this anonymous survey (one per company). If you fill out the form, I will provide the results to the source providing the survey to you. The results will be aggregated and used for academic purposes only, including to form the basis of policy recommendations I'll disseminate to the public, including via twitter: @colleen_chien.

The survey solicits your input on patent demands - e.g. demand letters, requests to license, and lawsuits. However, you should take the survey even if you've never received a demand. Please do not include your name or the name of any specific "demander"; if you do, your response may be discarded. The entire survey should take 2-15 minutes. The answers will be kept strictly confidential. More information:

Your feedback on this issue is really important! Thank you so much for taking the time and please contact me with any questions or concerns:

Colleen Chien
Assistant Professor
Santa Clara University School of Law
Thank you!
Congress would like to know if this is as big a problem as they're hearing, so a well-done survey collecting real-world experiences would be helpful. Please do spread the word in all the ways you know about, including ones that the Internet makes possible, if you don't personally have an experience to share.

This is an opportunity to be heard (no, I can't guarantee results, but at least it's an opportunity to help, if anyone chooses to act), so if you've ever complained that no one is listening to developers, this is a good time to speak and tell what you know.


Can You Please Help With a Patent Demand Survey? ~ pj | 141 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections here
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:29 AM EDT
So they can be fixed

My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | # ]

News picks
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:30 AM EDT
Please make links clickable

My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off topic
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:31 AM EDT
Please make links clickable

My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Comes transcribing
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:32 AM EDT
Thank you for your support

My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | # ]

..biggest flaw in this survey, is the implied assumption patent is necessary for every business.
Authored by: arnt on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 11:49 AM EDT
..that's patently wrong. Justice is all we need.

..and, we would get that by proper legislation,
by proper compliance to the laws,
by proper application of the laws and
by proper enforcement of the laws.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Can't find the survey
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 01:33 PM EDT

The link the bitly refers me to is:

But there seems to be no survey, link to any survey, or instructions as to how
to take the survey. Just the page which pj has quoted.

Karl O. Pinc <>

[ Reply to This | # ]

No Patent Demands But ...
Authored by: sk43 on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 08:54 PM EDT
Many years ago one software project I worked on was hit with a trademark cease
and desist demand - the informal name for one of our programs (used only
internally) was also a company's name. The search engines somehow decided that
we were still more interesting than the commercial company. Our lawyers
examined the situation ... and immediately waved the white flag. Spent two
weeks renaming everything.

I also think the place I work was sent one of SCO's threatening letters - in any
case, I was told that SCO had sued IBM for copyright infringement (not actually
true at the time) and I was to track all Linux usage until 6 months after the
lawsuit was resolved. That was over 9 years ago, and I'm still tracking,
reading GL every day from work to determine when the 6 month timer starts.

[ Reply to This | # ]

The congressional hearing in question
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 03:45 AM EDT
Hearing Information

Hearing on: "The International Trade Commission and Patent Disputes"

Wednesday 7/18/2012 - 10:00 a.m.

2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet

By Direction of the Chairman

Hearing Documentation

Here's the subcomittee information. See if you can find YOUR representative:

The Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet shall
have jurisdiction over the following subject matters: copyright, patent,
trademark law, information technology, antitrust matters, other appropriate
matters as referred by the Chairman, and relevant oversight.

112th Congress Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the

B-352 R.H.O.B.
Tel: 225-5741

Mr. Goodlatte, Chairman
Mr. Quayle, Vice Chairman ((R) Arizona, 3rd)
Mr. Sensenbrenner ((R) Wisconsin, 5th)
Mr. Watt ((D) North Carolina, 12th)
Mr. Coble ((R) North Carolina, 6th)
Mr. Conyers (Ranking Member(D) Michigan, 14th)
Mr. Chabot ((R) Ohio, 1st)
Mr. Berman ((D) California, 28th)
Mr. Issa ((R) California, 49th)
Ms. Chu ((D) California, 32nd)
Mr. Pence ((R) Indiana, 6th)
Mr. Deutch ((D) Florida, 19th)
Mr. Jordan ((R) Ohio, 4th)
Ms. Sánchez ((D) California, 39th)
Mr. Poe ((R) Texas, 2nd)
Mr. Nadler ((D) New York, 8th)
Mr. Chaffetz ((R) Utah, 3rd)
Ms. Lofgren ((D) California, 16th)
Mr. Griffin ((R) Arkansas, 2nd)
Ms. Jackson Lee ((D) Texas, 18th)
Mr. Marino ((R) Pennsylvania, 10th)
Ms. Waters ((D) California, 35th)
Ms. Adams ((R) Florida, 24th)
Mr. Johnson ((D) Georgia, 4th)
Mr. Amodei ((R) Nevada, 2nd)


[ Reply to This | # ]

Wont the results be biased?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 10:42 AM EDT
If you let respondents self select, wont you get responses mostly from angry,
motivated people and get no responses from people who have not been adversely

Seems like a very poor way to do a survey to me.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )