|
Oracle v. Google - Administrative Matters |
|
Saturday, March 31 2012 @ 08:40 AM EDT
|
Not a lot of activity in the case yesterday. Only a couple of administrative filings. In the first (841 [PDF; Text]) the Court addresses what it expects to be somewhat crowded conditions in the public seating area of the courtroom at the beginning of the trial. In part this is due to the large size of the jury pool. So the Court has asked the respective parties to limit the size of their entourages.
In the second (842 [PDF; Text]) the parties have agreed on the manner in which Dr. Kearl, the court-appointed damages expert, will be introduced to the jury:
“Dr. Kearl is an independent expert who was not retained by either party, but was appointed by the Court to testify in this case. The Court has ordered that his fees are to be paid by both Oracle and Google. You should consider his testimony in the same way that you would any other witness’s.”
Not that everything in this case has to cut in favor of one party or the other, but you have to wonder whether this introduction doesn't benefit Google on two counts.
First, Dr. Kearl is introduced as an independent expert appointed by the court. If you are in the jury and you are introduced to three experts, one appointed by and paid for by each party and the third who is introduced as independent and appointed by the court, aren't you going to be inclined to give the opinion of the court-appointed independent expert more weight? I would think that is natural.
Second, from what we have seen, Dr. Kearl's opinion is going to be closer to the Google position than the Oracle position, and it is certainly not going to result in damages higher than what Oracle is requesting. So my sense is that this introduction will favor Google.
************
Docket
03/30/2012 - 841 - ORDER
REGARDING SEATING FOR FIRST DAY OF TRIAL. Signed by Judge Alsup on March
30, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012) (Entered: 03/30/2012)
03/30/2012 - 842 -
Statement Joint Statement Regarding Introduction of Dr. James Kearl to
the Jury by Google Inc.. (Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 3/30/2012)
(Entered: 03/30/2012)
************
Documents
841
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
No. C 10-03561 WHA
ORDER REGARDING
SEATING FOR FIRST
DAY OF TRIAL
____________________________
On the first day of trial we will need to reserve the west side of the public seating for the
venire. To make room for more members of the public, counsel are requested to minimize the
size of their teams in the public seating on the east side. Once the jury is sworn, we should have
enough room for all. Please remind all team members not to communicate with venire members.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 30, 2012.
/s/ William Alsup
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
842
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:10-cv-03651 WHA
JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING
INTRODUCTION OF DR. JAMES KEARL
TO THE JURY
Dept.: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor
Judge: Hon. William Alsup
Pursuant to the Court’s request at the March 28, 2012 pretrial hearing, the parties have met and conferred regarding the introduction of Dr. Kearl to the jury. The parties, as well as Dr. Kearl, agree that Dr. Kearl should be introduced to the jury as follows:
“Dr. Kearl is an independent expert who was not retained by either party, but was appointed by the Court to testify in this case. The Court has ordered that his fees are to be paid by both Oracle and Google. You should consider his testimony in the same way that you would any other witness’s.”
1
Dated: March 30, 2012
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
By: /s/ Robert A. Van Nest
ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065)
[email]
CHRISTA M. ANDERSON (SBN184325)
[email]
DANIEL PURCELL (SBN 191424)
[email address telephone fax]
SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice)
[email]
ROBERT F. PERRY
[email]
BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice)
[email address telephone fax]
DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (SBN 112279)
[email]
CHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323)
[email]
KING & SPALDING LLP
[address telephone fax]
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
IAN C. BALLON (SBN 141819)
[email]
HEATHER MEEKER (SBN 172148)
[email address telephone fax]
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
2
Dated: March 30, 2012
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
By: /s/ Steven C. Holtzman
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[email address telephone fax]
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177)
[email address telephone fax]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664)
[email]
KENNETH A. KUWAYTI (Bar No. 145384)
[email]
MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725)
[email]
DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624)
[email address telephone fax]
ORACLE CORPORATION
DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049)
[email]
DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527)
[email]
MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600)
[email address telephone fax]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
3
Dated: March 30, 2012
FARELLA, BRAUN & MARTEL LLP
By: /s/ John L. Cooper
FARELLA, BRAUN & MARTEL LLP
JOHN L. COOPER
[email address telephone]
Attorneys for Independent Expert
DR. JAMES KEARL
4
ATTESTATION
I, Robert A. Van Nest, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING INTRODUCTION OF DR. JAMES KEARL TO THE JURY. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Steven C. Holtzman and John L. Cooper concurred in this filing.
Date: March 30, 2012
/s/ Robert A. Van Nest
5
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 31 2012 @ 09:19 AM EDT |
"Second, from what we have seen, Dr. Kearl's opinion is going to be closer
to the
Google position than the Oracle position, and it is certainly not going to
result in
damages higher than what Oracle is requesting. So my sense is that this
introduction will favor Google."
What? Closer to the Google position resulting in higher damages (against Google,
right?) is favorable?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: fredex on Saturday, March 31 2012 @ 09:33 AM EDT |
Put yer korrekshuns heer! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Kilz on Saturday, March 31 2012 @ 09:43 AM EDT |
For all posts that are not on topic. Please make links
clickable.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Kilz on Saturday, March 31 2012 @ 09:45 AM EDT |
Please mention the news story's name in the top most post. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SilverWave on Sunday, April 01 2012 @ 09:38 AM EDT |
Apple drops
'thermonuclear' patent bombshell --- RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|