decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
SCO v. Novell Trial Transcripts - with line numbers - complete
Friday, July 23 2010 @ 09:08 PM EDT

We have all the transcripts from the SCO v. Novell trial now as text, a version for each day with line numbers, so as to match the PDFs. I'll be writing about them one by one, pointing out interesting things, with versions without the line numbers, for readability as well. I've done that for day 1 and day 2, and I'll keep working through them all, all 15 days. So you can pick and choose which way you prefer to read the transcripts. I don't want you to have to wait, though, so here's a calendar you can use right now, to find whatever day of the trial that interests you the most, the text versions with line numbers:

March 2010
M Tu W Th F
08 09 10 11 12
15 16 17 18 19
22 23 24 25 26

You'll find a copy of this calendar on each page, so you can navigate any way you like. Enjoy!


  


SCO v. Novell Trial Transcripts - with line numbers - complete | 34 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections here.
Authored by: jesse on Friday, July 23 2010 @ 09:10 PM EDT
Thank you

[ Reply to This | # ]

News Picks...
Authored by: jesse on Friday, July 23 2010 @ 09:11 PM EDT
Thank you.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off topic
Authored by: jesse on Friday, July 23 2010 @ 09:12 PM EDT
Thanks...

[ Reply to This | # ]

COMES here please.
Authored by: jesse on Friday, July 23 2010 @ 09:13 PM EDT
Thank you

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO v. Novell Trial Transcripts - with line numbers - complete
Authored by: cjk fossman on Friday, July 23 2010 @ 11:42 PM EDT
This is great.
Thanks, PJ.

[ Reply to This | # ]

"Excuse me?" - Priceless!!
Authored by: SK8TRBOI on Sunday, July 25 2010 @ 05:27 PM EDT
One of my favorite exchanges from March 25:
Mr. Acker on Direct...
2 Q Did you understand in the APA that, in fact, the
3 copyrights to the UNIX code were not included in the
4 transferred assets?
5 A Yes.
6 MR. NORMAND: Objection, Your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Excuse me.
8 MR. NORMAND: Objection, Your Honor, calls for a
9 legal conclusion, among other things.
10 THE COURT: I'll overrule the objection.

---
SK8TRBOI

[ Reply to This | # ]

Biff?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 25 2010 @ 09:42 PM EDT
To support your idea a little, Judge Kimball summarized Anderer's position like this (on page 28):
On January 4, 2003, McBride received an email from Michael Anderer, a consultant for SCO retained to examine its intellectual property. Supp. Brakebill Decl. Ex. 12. Anderer stated that the APA "transferred substantially less" of Novell's intellectual property than Novell owned. Anderer noted that Santa Cruz's "asset purchase" from Novell "excludes all patents, copyrights, and just about everything else." Id. Anderer cautioned that "[w]e really need to be clear on what we can license. It may be a lot less than we think."
"Supp. Brakebill Decl. Ex. 12" referred to a copy of a January 4, 2003 email from Mike Anderer that was submitted by Novell. Unfortunately, it was never unsealed, AFAIK. I had been wanting to find it, unfortunately.

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • Please disregard - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 26 2010 @ 11:24 AM EDT
  • Here's Biff! - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 26 2010 @ 11:25 AM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )