|
|
| Tomorrow's SCO Bankruptcy Hearing Cancelled |
 |
|
Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 06:17 PM EDT
|
Tomorrow's bankruptcy hearing has been cancelled. This is the one that was about signing off on some fees billed to SCO, the one I told you probably was worth skipping. I gather the court agreed. Why pay lawyers to show up for a hearing on something that isn't opposed by anyone? It's an unnecessary expense, if the judge is just going to sign, which is what he was certainly going to do. This is a sensible move. The hearing that matters is the next one, on June 15 on whether to send SCO to Chapter 7 or not.
The filings:
05/28/2009 - 773 - Certification
of Counsel Regarding Omnibus Order Approving Certain Quarterly Fee
Applications (related document(s) 708, 720, 733) Filed by The SCO Group,
Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)
(O'Neill, James) (Entered: 05/28/2009)
05/28/2009 - 774 - HEARING
CANCELLED. Amended Notice of Agenda of Matters Scheduled for Hearing.
(related document(s) 771) Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. Hearing
scheduled for 5/29/2009 at 03:00 PM at US Bankruptcy Court, 824 Market
St., 6th Fl., Courtroom #3, Wilmington, Delaware. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of
Service and Service List) (O'Neill, James) (Entered:
05/28/2009)
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 06:42 PM EDT |
| Place corrections here, should any be necessary.
---
"Then you admit
confirming not denying you ever said that?"
"NO! ... I mean Yes! WHAT?"
"I'll put `maybe.'"
--Bloom County [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 06:44 PM EDT |
| Discuss Groklaw News Picks here. Please mention which Groklaw News Pick you are
commenting on.
---
"Then you admit confirming not denying you ever
said that?"
"NO! ... I mean Yes! WHAT?"
"I'll put `maybe.'"
--Bloom County [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Microsoft Bing - Authored by: kawabago on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 08:47 PM EDT
- Microsoft Bing - Authored by: kjs on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 10:38 PM EDT
- Microsoft Bing - Authored by: Gringo on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 11:49 PM EDT
- (x) is not (y) - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 12:41 AM EDT
- Microsoft Bing - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 01:39 AM EDT
- LOL (n/t) - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 06:27 PM EDT
- Microsoft Bing - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 02:31 AM EDT
- Bing or Bling? - Authored by: digger53 on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 10:40 PM EDT
- Are you sure it's not Bilge? - Authored by: Imaginos1892 on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 11:14 PM EDT
- Its the S ame O ld S tuff Live, Kujo, now Bing LOL - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 03:26 AM EDT
- Google Wave - Authored by: Winter on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 02:25 AM EDT
- Google Wave - Authored by: PJ on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 02:46 AM EDT
- Google Wave - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 08:12 AM EDT
- # Microsoft Update Quietly Installs Firefox Extension - Authored by: ThrPilgrim on Sunday, May 31 2009 @ 01:35 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 06:46 PM EDT |
| Discuss Off Topically here.
Remember to post links in
HTML.
---
"Then you admit confirming not denying you ever said
that?"
"NO! ... I mean Yes! WHAT?"
"I'll put `maybe.'"
--Bloom County [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Henning Makholm on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 07:20 PM EDT |
I'm not saying that this hearing ought to have been held, but I'm confused by
the procedure for canceling it. It appears to be SCO's lawyers that have
canceled the hearing, rather than the court. Why can they do that -- oughtn't it
be the court who decides what it needs to hold a hearing on?
Shouldn't there at least be some sort of certification that "we have spoken
to the other creditors, and they all agree that this hearing is
unnecessary"? They do say that they've circulated their proposed order to
the ones who're going to get paid, but surely those are the ones LEAST likely to
object?
Would SCO's lawyers also be able to unilaterally cancel the June 15 hearing and
remove the Chapter-7 motions from the court's agenda?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: LaurenceTux on Thursday, May 28 2009 @ 09:35 PM EDT |
So do we set the Death Clock to say 2 hours after the hearing
on june 15??
16:0015072009EDT
track list for the party
Final Countdown
Chopins Death March
Hells Bells
Liberty Bell March
Imperial March
what else??[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: AH1 on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 01:07 AM EDT |
We are not that lucky. What are the odds that they try to appeal this one as
well.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: IMANAL_TOO on Friday, May 29 2009 @ 01:17 AM EDT |
Maybe missed it. If SCO goes into Chapter 7, what is next?
Are they out forever? Or are there still ways to postpone trials and/or pursuit
lawsuits?
---
______
IMANAL
.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
