|
|
| Members Only -- Docket Update - BK and AutoZone |
 |
|
Wednesday, January 21 2009 @ 07:20 PM EST
|
Some monthly operating reports from the SCO bankruptcy docket, and there is now an official scheduling order in the AutoZone case. Update: No longer Members Only.
Here are the BK filings:
01/21/2009 665 Amended Debtor-In-Possession Monthly Operating Report for Filing Period October 2008 of SCO Operations, Inc. (related document(s) 646 ) Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service and Service List) (Makowski, Kathleen) (Entered: 01/21/2009)
01/21/2009 666 Debtor-In-Possession Monthly Operating Report for Filing Period November 2008 of SCO Operations, Inc. Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service and Service List) (Makowski, Kathleen) (Entered: 01/21/2009)
01/21/2009 667 Debtor-In-Possession Monthly Operating Report for Filing Period November 2008 of The SCO Group, Inc. Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service and Service List) (Makowski, Kathleen) (Entered: 01/21/2009)
And the AutoZone filing:
01/21/2009 90 SCHEDULING ORDER. Discovery due by 4/9/2010. Motions due by 5/10/2010. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/9/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge George W Foley, Jr on 1/21/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AXM) (Entered: 01/21/2009)
-- The Groklaw Team
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: BobinAlaska on Wednesday, January 21 2009 @ 07:42 PM EST |
I can't believe they are still wanting to spend money on this! Even though
Boise and Co have been paid they still have all the expenses for discovery and
other stuff. Where do they think they are going to get the money from?
---
Bob Helm, Juneau, Alaska
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: The Mad Hatter r on Wednesday, January 21 2009 @ 11:18 PM EST |
Why would TSCOG want to move forward with this? There must be a valid reason (to
them) but I cannot see what it would be. Does anyone have any ideas?
---
Wayne
http://sourceforge.net/projects/twgs-toolkit/
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: mtew on Thursday, January 22 2009 @ 08:52 AM EST |
I do not recall any explanation why these updates are Members Only. If there is
no particular reason, could they please be posted as generally available?
---
MTEW[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Marc Mengel on Thursday, January 22 2009 @ 10:48 AM EST |
| Put things that you think would be news picks here... [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, January 23 2009 @ 04:28 PM EST |
Feel free.
---
Monopolistic Ignominious Corporation Requiring Office $tandard Only For
Themselves[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
