|
Exhibits and Transcripts from Comes v. Microsoft |
|
Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 10:14 AM EST
|
The Register is crying about the loss to historians of the exhibits and transcripts from Comes v. Microsoft lawsuit. However, Groklaw will not let these Microsoft documents disappear. We have all of the materials, thanks to Groklaw members who had the foresight to save it all as it appeared, just in case. Here are some of the exhibits and the court trial transcripts. You'll find the Bill Gates video deposition played to the jury here. Eventually we'll make a permanent page. It's not finished yet, as we will be adding more descriptions on all the exhibits and notations on who was on the witness stand in each transcript, more exhibits will be added when time permits. You can help by leaving a comment on what you found of interest in a particular exhibit or transcript.
These documents are all public domain materials by order of the judge in the case.
-- MathFox
|
|
Authored by: feldegast on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 10:20 AM EST |
So Mathfox can fix them
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2007 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Mathfox -> MathFox :-) - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 10:31 AM EST
- Humility Please - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 01:25 PM EST
- Patience Please - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 05:17 PM EST
- The Register - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 05:31 PM EST
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 10:23 AM EST |
Mathfox,
Personally, I consider this just about as valuable a service as all the work
performed by PJ on SCO vs MS.
A paranoid reader.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 10:30 AM EST |
How about donating it to Project Gutenberg? http://www.gutenberg.org [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 10:34 AM EST |
This one is more positive, and a Groklawer gets a mention.
Link [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 10:48 AM EST |
According to news reports, the South African government plans to switch all
government departments to Linux. Government communications head Themba Maseko
said, "All new software developed for or by the government will be based on
open standards and government will itself migrate current software to
FOSS."[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Off-topic - Comment on themes and "Where is ...?" map - Authored by: alisonken1 on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 11:45 AM EST
- newspick-Request for testers/bug fixers/coders for new license tool - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 11:52 AM EST
- My thoughts on Dell with Linux pricing - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 12:02 PM EST
- Judgment day is going down - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 01:16 PM EST
- Off-topic - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 03:58 PM EST
- A billion here, a billion there... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 04:02 PM EST
- Use the non-anonymous off topic thread further down. - Authored by: kh on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 05:06 PM EST
- Another chair bites the dust... - Authored by: lordshipmayhem on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 06:20 PM EST
- Buy Stock in a Chair Manufacturing company in Redmond - Authored by: MDT on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 07:29 PM EST
- SCOG to report - Authored by: BobinAlaska on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 09:40 PM EST
- Off-topic Boies interview - Authored by: GelW on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 11:29 PM EST
- Off-topic thread NOW posted below /NT - Authored by: artp on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 12:00 AM EST
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 10:53 AM EST |
The torrent on thepiratebay.org (titled just "iowa") has does not
contain all the court tramscripts (it stops at 8 january) but it does have a lot
of pdf files more. So I'm merging these sources.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 11:06 AM EST |
Sorry for posting anon, I can't find my login right now.
I think it's time for two new changes at Groklaw:
1. A process that auto-exports a locally browsable (perhaps auto-PDF generation)
version of the entire contents of Groklaw in static snapshot form, updated
weekly, available for users to download and mirror.
While I'm thinking primarily of comments, articles and analysis, the available
files, transcriptions, PDFs, etc. should also be available for easy mirroring.
It seems clear that the-powers-that-be will continue taking potshots at Groklaw,
and having a process that allows for the entire snapshot of Groklaw to be saved
in the event of a takedown, would be historically good. Think of it as a
backup, with the users acting as the redundancy.
This needs to be a feature, rather than individual users running a bot to slurp
all the html pages, because that will put undue stress on the server and keep
the bandwidth bill high.
2. With PJs absence, it highlights the fact that there is a SPOF (Single Point
of Failure) in the current configuration of Groklaw.
While it's nice to see the articles continue to get generated (thanks MathFox
et. al), Groklaw should be set up with a team of (para)legal commentators, so
that the temporary or permanent loss of any one of the commentators (sickness,
vacation, etc.) will not stop the flow of biting truthful analysis.
In essence, Groklaw needs to transition from a Santa's helpers to a redundant
architecture.
If they hobble a contributor, someone else can take up the legal analysis slack.
If they hobble the site, the content is not disappeared.
Let's not let this wake-up call go unnoticed. I'm sure there are many people who
can contribute in the way of code for the autogeneration system, and patches to
the GeekLog system to address redundancy, mirroring, and redundancy in legal
analysis contributors.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 11:42 AM EST |
PJ, Mathfox,
Backups are of course, very necessary. How about putting the data onto DVD(s) so
other individuals may maintain backup copies? Copies could be sold at a nominal
cost to support their production in a fashion similar to John Young's
"Cryptome" site located at: <a href="
http://www.jya.com/"> www.jya.com/</a>
There's probably too much for single disk so perhaps breaking the data into
subcategories categories would be more helpful:
1) SCO, 2) Microsoft, 3) others
I'm sure anybody who wants to support the ongoing efforts of Groklaw would be an
early adopter. Researchers would find these "gold mines" helpful in
preparing manuscripts and other documents, librarians could add to their
libraries, lawyers would have more bullets for their 'guns', etc.
anon46
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: FrnchFrgg on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 11:47 AM EST |
I have transcoded anew the wmv files since the ogg theora ones provided on the
site had problems with the speed of the video.
Two rounds of video are on my http server:
-one high quality, only transcoded and letting VLC choose the right parameters
to loose the least of quality. Those are MPEG 2 + VORBIS in an OGG container
(current version of VLC segfaults when encoding THEORA on half of the videos).
They are roughly the same size as the WMVs (a little smaller) exept for one
which is half the size (I cannot explain it, it is complete), and the loss of
quality (if any) isn't noticeable.
location: http://frnchfrgg-home.hd.free.fr/perso/gates/Gates<num>Depo.ogg
-one low quality, MPEG 1 (it's purported to be better than MPEG2 at low
bitrates) 64kbps + VORBIS 48kbps, all 320x240 except the first (352x240). I
tried speex for audio, but it doesn't make smaller files (maybe because the
background noise is difficult for a voice-optimized codec ?)
They are 4 to 5 times smaller than the full quality OGG, and could be even
smaller had I managed to make VLC produce mono output.
location: http://frnchfrgg-home.hd.free.fr/perso/gates/low-<num>.ogg
Hope that helps.
(Already sent to MathFox by e-mail, but I am not sure if it reached him)
_FrnchFrgg_
P.S.: I don't know if or when I'll need to reclaim the disk space of those
files, so you shouldn't rely on their availability on my server. Also keep in
mind that it's my home server, mainly used as a debian repository, so do not
expect godly upload rates from it.
---
_FrnchFrgg_[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: john-from-ct on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 12:11 PM EST |
I posted a comment on the Register that the exhibits are available here.
---
Just another greybeard geek![ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 12:31 PM EST |
I suspect Microsoft's working on plans to block Groklaw itself.
Would PJ's price to sell out as easily and cheaply as Hovsepian did?
A half billion means little to Microsoft. If you were PJ, for what price would
you sell?
Any other techniques they might use?
I like the earlier comment on this article asking for an easy way for random end
users to mirror Groklaw - all the comments, all the articles, etc. Would a
database dump feature or a rsync interface to groklaw be possible (legally and
technically)?
Mostly I really don't want to see Groklaw vanish; and after the Comes v
Microsoft mirror comes up I'm pretty sure Microsoft will want it to vanish.
Things tend not to last long when that happens.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Bill The Cat on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 04:59 PM EST |
Microsoft hit with $1.52 billion patent suit
damages
Yep, more proof that Microsoft is a honorable corporate
citizen.
--- Bill The Cat [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: gfim on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 05:09 PM EST |
As I've said here (and elsewhere) a few times, whether pure code can or cannot
be patented is not the important question for most people. We really need to
know whether pure code (or documentation, or data files) can be an
infringement of a patent. If there was a ruling that it could not, then
99% of the FUD from Microsoft et al would go poof.
--- Graham [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Does it matter? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 08:54 PM EST
|
Authored by: DaveJakeman on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 05:14 PM EST |
You can help by leaving a comment on what you found of interest in
a particular exhibit or transcript.
Post 'em here:
--- I
would rather stand corrected than sit confused.
---
Should one hear an accusation, try it on the accuser. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Exhibits 4574, 4576, 4588 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 05:55 PM EST
- 1999 - Forwarded email: Tony Ingenoso[PSP] --> Rick Segal[MS] --> Bradsi - Authored by: Brian S. on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 11:50 PM EST
- PLEX_5906 - MS definition of embrace and extend - Authored by: PolR on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 02:19 AM EST
- Clarification - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 03:42 AM EST
- Exhibit 4564 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 04:55 AM EST
- Exhibit 4563 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 05:38 AM EST
- Exhibit 4562 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 05:59 AM EST
- Exhibit 4561 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 06:42 AM EST
- Exhibit 4560 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 06:58 AM EST
- Exhibit 4559 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 07:23 AM EST
- Exhibit 4546A - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 09:08 AM EST
- Exhibit 4521 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 10:28 AM EST
- Exhibit 4517 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 10:37 AM EST
- Exhibit 4516 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 10:47 AM EST
- Exhibit 4497 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 12:13 PM EST
- Exhibit 4482 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 05:08 PM EST
- Exhibit 4471 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 05:45 PM EST
- Exhibit 4470 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 06:22 PM EST
- Exhibit 4455 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Saturday, February 24 2007 @ 06:10 AM EST
- Exhibit 4453 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Saturday, February 24 2007 @ 03:25 PM EST
- Exhibit 4448 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Saturday, February 24 2007 @ 03:54 PM EST
- Exhibit 4440 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Saturday, February 24 2007 @ 04:27 PM EST
- Exhibit 4439 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Saturday, February 24 2007 @ 04:58 PM EST
- Exhibit 4438 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Saturday, February 24 2007 @ 05:56 PM EST
- Exhibit 4437 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Saturday, February 24 2007 @ 06:24 PM EST
- Exhibit 4435 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Saturday, February 24 2007 @ 06:47 PM EST
- Exhibit 4430 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 02:53 AM EST
- Exhibit 4429 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 03:34 AM EST
- Exhibit 4428 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 06:39 AM EST
- Exhibit 4427 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 06:59 AM EST
- Exhibit 4426 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 07:12 AM EST
- Exhibit 4425 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 10:13 AM EST
- Exhibit 4424 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 10:54 AM EST
- Exhibit 4423 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 11:49 AM EST
- Exhibit 4422 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 12:30 PM EST
- Exhibit 4421 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Sunday, February 25 2007 @ 01:48 PM EST
- Exhibit 4411 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Monday, February 26 2007 @ 12:34 PM EST
- Exhibit 4410 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Monday, February 26 2007 @ 12:58 PM EST
- Exhibit 4407 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, February 27 2007 @ 02:54 PM EST
- Exhibit 141 (px00141.pdf) - 1989 re: DefineHandleTable - Authored by: aschulman on Tuesday, February 27 2007 @ 04:04 PM EST
- Exhibit 619 (px00619.pdf) - 1991 re: "Chinese Wall" between MS apps and OS - Authored by: aschulman on Tuesday, February 27 2007 @ 04:07 PM EST
- Exhibit 1495 (px01495.pdf) - "crises in confidence" - Authored by: aschulman on Tuesday, February 27 2007 @ 04:10 PM EST
- Exhibit 2383 (px02383.pdf) - Shell extensibility and ISVs (1995) - Authored by: aschulman on Tuesday, February 27 2007 @ 04:13 PM EST
- Exhibit 4402 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, February 27 2007 @ 04:21 PM EST
- Exhibit 4401 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, February 27 2007 @ 04:46 PM EST
- Exhibit 4400 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, February 27 2007 @ 04:55 PM EST
- Exhibit 4396 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, February 27 2007 @ 06:10 PM EST
- Exhibit 4178 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Wednesday, February 28 2007 @ 08:12 AM EST
- Exhibit 3994 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Wednesday, February 28 2007 @ 09:16 AM EST
- Exhibit 3793 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Wednesday, February 28 2007 @ 09:33 AM EST
- Exhibit 3668 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Monday, March 05 2007 @ 06:29 AM EST
- Exhibit 3667 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Monday, March 05 2007 @ 07:13 AM EST
- Exhibit 3534 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Monday, March 05 2007 @ 09:16 AM EST
- Exhibit 3505 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, March 06 2007 @ 06:15 AM EST
- Exhibit 3383D - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, March 06 2007 @ 07:51 AM EST
- Exhibit 3247 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, March 06 2007 @ 10:57 AM EST
- Exhibit 3190 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, March 06 2007 @ 02:57 PM EST
- Exhibit 3174 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Tuesday, March 06 2007 @ 03:14 PM EST
- Exhibit 3159 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Thursday, March 08 2007 @ 07:23 AM EST
- Exhibit 2904 - Authored by: DaveJakeman on Thursday, March 08 2007 @ 09:55 AM EST
|
Authored by: grouch on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 06:47 PM EST |
The bits and bytes are still slowly marching up to my website. I think my wife
is contemplating something desperate with the shotgun; it takes about a minute
just to check email while this upload is going on.
It will take at least a
couple more days at my connection speed, but the following directories under
http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org are now complete (any other
directories you spot may have partial files and should not be trusted
yet):
010807/
011107/
011207/
011607/0000/
011607/1000
/
011607/2000/
011607/3000/
011607/4000/
011607/5000/
Still to go are the 6000, 7000, 8000, 9000 directories under 011607 plus a
directory named 122106. After that will be a 65M upload of what I grabbed from
iowaconsumercase.org (which was different from what used to be at
www.iowaconsumercase.org).
There are text transcripts under
http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/ along with "Media_Update" and
other PDFs. All files were downloaded from the Comes v. Microsoft website during
2 separate mirroring downloads over the course of about 2 weeks. Sorry, but I
don't have a clue about how to prove the files I'm uploading are the same as the
ones I downloaded. You can compare them to other mirrors.
--- --
grouch
http://edge-op.org/links1.html
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Iowa documents - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 07:28 PM EST
- Iowa documents - Authored by: grouch on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 12:42 AM EST
- cURL ? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 03:43 AM EST
- md5sum - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 09:16 PM EST
- md5sum - Authored by: grouch on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 12:34 AM EST
- Iowa documents - DONE! - Authored by: grouch on Saturday, February 24 2007 @ 07:52 PM EST
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 09:46 PM EST |
if you can, setting up something like a torrent for the video would be best to
keep the bandwidth usage low. you don't need a tracker, you can use a magnet
link system.
once it gets somewhere like mininova, it'll never dissappear.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- um... - Authored by: qu1j0t3 on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 06:00 PM EST
- um... - Authored by: jig on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 10:24 PM EST
|
Authored by: artp on Thursday, February 22 2007 @ 11:58 PM EST |
Posted Non-Anonymous so that we end up with only one thread for Off Topic. Best
solution for the maximum number of people. Because PJ asked us to do it this
way. Because it's confusing otherwise. Because Anonymous posting is provided for
those who need it, just for nice, but be nice in return. Because I ran out of
reasons.
I can't believe that the Off Topic threas is this far down.
---
Every time I have seen a business move enterprise (business-critical) software
to Windows, the company has gone broke if small, or lost lots of money if large.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: aschulman on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 12:20 AM EST |
While the supplemental expert report that I wrote in Comes v. Microsoft has been
made public, the initial expert report I wrote hasn't yet. The supplemental
report was written after I had an opportunity to review Microsoft's Windows and
Office source code, and for the most part merely provides additional bases for
opinions that I had already given in the earlier report. The earlier report was
based on reverse engineering of the Windows and Office binary code, upon many
Microsoft internal documents (such as emails), and upon public documents such as
patents, documentation at MSDN, and blogs by Microsoft employees.
Since the
supplemental report is already public, but may make little sense outside the
context of the initial report, I have uploaded a copy of the table of contents
of the initial report:
http://www.sonic.net/~undoc/comes_v_microsoft/comes_v_ms_schulman_opinion
s.txt
Microsoft's attorney made the following statement at trial on Feb.
12:
"MR. HOLLEY: Your Honor, very briefly before the jury comes in, I just
wanted to report that over the weekend we'd had an opportunity to look at the
approximately 50 internal Microsoft documents that Mr. Schulman refers to in his
expert report. And we are -- we are of the view that none of them is
sufficiently confidential to stop the document from being released publicly. So
we have no objection to both the first expert report and the first deposition
being released to the public."
So there should be no problem in
providing the initial expert report in its entirety. However, I am going to be
overly cautious about this for the next few weeks. My goal is to upload not only
the initial report, but also extensive comments on it, including links to the
Microsoft internal documents from which it quotes. In the meantime, like I said,
here is the table of contents of the initial report, to help put the
supplemental expert report in context.
I also think it would be great
to have some balance provided by the technical expert reports that were
submitted by expert witnesses called by Microsoft.
Andrew
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 23 2007 @ 10:03 PM EST |
Is it true part of the settlement is to supply Microsoft Software to schools
(free of charge)?
Wouldn't it be more appropriate if Microsoft had to pay for some other
supplier's software, Redhat / Novell / Apple to be provided to these schools?
Installing extending the Microsoft user base plays directly into the monopoly
position, and this case was about monopoly abuse.
In fact, it would make sense to have a law to make such a settlement illegal in
monopoly cases. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|