|
|
| Hearing in Novell January 11th |
 |
|
Thursday, January 04 2007 @ 02:18 AM EST
|
There will be a hearing in SCO v. Novell on January 11th at 10:30 AM Utah time. Here's what Pacer has:
01/03/2007 193 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: 165 MOTION to Compel Production of Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits from SCO v. IBM : Motion Hearing set for 1/11/2007 10:30 AM in Room 436 before Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells. (jwd) (Entered: 01/03/2007) This hearing will be on Novell's motion to compel.
Here are the motion papers: Novell's Motion to Compel Production of Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits from SCO v. IBMSCO's Memorandum in Opposition
Reply in Support of Novell's Expedited Motion to Compel Production of Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits from SCO v. IBM Novell wants to get transcripts of depositions from SCO v. IBM. Specifically, it wants William Broderick's, Chris Sontag's, Blake Stowell's, Erik Hughes's, one of Jeff Hunsaker's, and six experts' depositions.
And in SCO v. IBM:
01/02/2007 911 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [894] SEALED MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Wheatley, Nathan) (Entered: 01/02/2007) If any of you can go on the 11th, please give me a heads up.
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Wol on Thursday, January 04 2007 @ 02:41 AM EST |
And smelling pistakes
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Wol on Thursday, January 04 2007 @ 02:43 AM EST |
The non-anonymous off-topic ...
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: skidrash on Thursday, January 04 2007 @ 05:34 AM EST |
or Novell's demand for sworn declartions by SCO lawyers, specifying why each
deposition NOT turned over was not turned over.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
