|
|
| Table of Summary Judgment Motions |
 |
|
Friday, December 22 2006 @ 08:21 PM EST
|
Here's something useful a volunteer did for us, Groklaw member PacerAddict, to help us keep track of the various summary judgment motions in SCO v IBM, to spare us having to go back and forth to the IBM
Timeline page. We can keep it updated as more filings show up. We can also use it to see what we need done as text still (note I have 832 and 883 done but not checked yet). A lot still needs to be done.
*************************************************
| Movant |
Subject |
Motion |
Memorandum in Support |
Memorandum in Opposition |
Reply Memorandum |
Hearing Date |
Decision |
| IBM |
Motion for SJ on SCO's Contract Claims (SCO's First, Second, Third and Fourth Causes of Action) |
[780]
[Article]
|
[832-1]
[832-2]
[Article; text.]
|
[872; redacted as 960] [ text of redacted memo in opposition, with appendix ] |
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] |
March 1, 2007 [Report on hearing; Transcript] |
pending |
| IBM |
Motion for SJ on SCO's Copyright Claim (SCO's Fifth Cause of Action) |
[781]
[Article]
|
[829]
[Article; text]
|
[903-1]
[903-2]
[903-A]
[Article]
|
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] |
Report from the courtroom March 1, 2007 [ Transcript] |
pending |
| IBM |
Motion for SJ on SCO's Unfair Competition Claim (SCO's Sixth Cause of Action) |
[782]
[Article]
|
[830]
[Article]
text]
|
[907; redacted as 909]
[ Article and on 909]
[text ] |
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] |
Report from the courtroom March 5, 2007; Transcript |
pending |
| IBM |
Motion for SJ on SCO's Interference Claims (SCO's Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Causes of Action) |
[783]
[Article]
|
[836]
[Article]
|
[908; redacted as 910]
[Article and on 910]
[text] |
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] |
Report from the courtroom March 5, 2007; Transcript |
pending |
| IBM |
Motion for SJ on IBM's Eighth Counterclaim (Copyright Infringement re GPL) |
[784]
[Article]
|
[826]
[Article
|
Memo in opposition redacted |
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] |
March 7 2007 [Hearing and Part 2; Transcript] |
pending |
| IBM |
Motion for Summary Judgment on its Claim for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement (IBM's 10th Counterclaim) |
[785]
[Article]
|
[838-A]
[838-B]
[Article]
|
Memo in opposition [PDF] redacted |
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] |
March 7 2007 [Hearing and Part 2; Transcript] |
pending |
| SCO |
Motion for SJ on SCO's Third Cause of Action for Breach of Contract |
[775]
[Article]
|
[821]
[Article]
|
[883]
[Article; text.]
|
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] |
Report from the courtroom March 1, 2007 [ Transcript] |
pending |
| SCO |
Motion for SJ on IBM's Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Counterclaims |
[776]
[Article]
|
[820]
[Article]
|
[882 ]
[Article]
[Text]
|
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] |
March 7, 2007 [Hearing and Part 2; Transcript] |
pending |
| SCO |
Motion for SJ on IBM's Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Counterclaims |
[777]
[Article]
|
[794]
[Article]
[Text]
|
[881]
[Article]
[Text]
|
Reply memorandum |
March 7 2007 [Hearing and Part 2; Transcript] |
pending |
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Simon G Best on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 09:05 PM EST |
Corrections here, please, if there are any.
---
NO SOFTWARE PATENTS
- AT ALL! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Corrections - Authored by: nowster on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 09:51 PM EST
- Corrections - Authored by: jiri on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 10:39 PM EST
- Corrections - Authored by: DannyB on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 11:37 PM EST
- Agreed - Authored by: Erwan on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 04:13 AM EST
- Hearing Dates - Authored by: Erwan on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 04:18 AM EST
- Corrections - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 04:17 PM EST
- Corrections - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 04:18 PM EST
| |
| Authored by: Simon G Best on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 09:07 PM EST |
Off-topic stuff here, please.
As usual, see the stuff just below the
comment form for permitted HTML, and don't forget to post in HTML mode for those
links :-)
---
NO SOFTWARE PATENTS - AT ALL! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: The Mad Hatter r on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 10:45 PM EST |
So TSCOG has filed FIVE (5) sealed memorandums in opposition, and hasn't
supplied the redacted versions yet. Maybe they don't have enough lawyers to do
the redaction. Maybe they are scared to do the redaction - after all who knows
what we'll do with it...
Hum, that thought make me feel a bit better, but I'd really like to see the full
filings, and have them publicly available. Of course there's no advantage to
either BSF or TSCOG in allowing this, thought I suspect that IBM would find this
quite amusing.
IBM appears to have filed redacted copies of everything. Of course IBM actually
pays their lawyers.
---
Wayne
http://urbanterrorist.blogspot.com/
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: electron on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 10:49 PM EST |
While it is nice to see such a chart as this, why are all the reply memoranda
showing as being due on the 1st of December 2007?
---
Electron
"A life? Sounds great! Do you know where I could download one?"[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: webster on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 12:24 AM EST |
.
In case your ineterested.
---
webster
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Nivag on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 02:10 AM EST |
'01/12/07'
is that '1st December 2007'?
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 07:59 AM EST |
I'd like to help out and transcribe some stuff. Is there a list of pdfs I could
choose from and mark it "in work"?
cb[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 01:42 PM EST |
| X [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
