decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Table of Summary Judgment Motions
Friday, December 22 2006 @ 08:21 PM EST

Here's something useful a volunteer did for us, Groklaw member PacerAddict, to help us keep track of the various summary judgment motions in SCO v IBM, to spare us having to go back and forth to the IBM Timeline page. We can keep it updated as more filings show up. We can also use it to see what we need done as text still (note I have 832 and 883 done but not checked yet). A lot still needs to be done.

*************************************************

Movant Subject Motion Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Opposition Reply Memorandum Hearing Date Decision
IBM Motion for SJ on SCO's Contract Claims (SCO's First, Second, Third and Fourth Causes of Action) [780] [Article] [832-1] [832-2] [Article; text.] [872; redacted as 960] [ text of redacted memo in opposition, with appendix ] Notice of conventional filing [PDF] March 1, 2007 [Report on hearing; Transcript] pending
IBM Motion for SJ on SCO's Copyright Claim (SCO's Fifth Cause of Action) [781] [Article] [829] [Article; text] [903-1] [903-2] [903-A] [Article] Notice of conventional filing [PDF] Report from the courtroom March 1, 2007 [ Transcript] pending
IBM Motion for SJ on SCO's Unfair Competition Claim (SCO's Sixth Cause of Action) [782] [Article] [830] [Article]
text]
[907; redacted as 909]
[ Article and on 909]
[text ]
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] Report from the courtroom March 5, 2007; Transcript pending
IBM Motion for SJ on SCO's Interference Claims (SCO's Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Causes of Action) [783] [Article] [836] [Article] [908; redacted as 910]
[Article and on 910]
[text]
Notice of conventional filing [PDF] Report from the courtroom March 5, 2007; Transcript pending
IBM Motion for SJ on IBM's Eighth Counterclaim (Copyright Infringement re GPL) [784] [Article] [826] [Article Memo in opposition redacted Notice of conventional filing [PDF] March 7 2007 [Hearing and Part 2; Transcript] pending
IBM Motion for Summary Judgment on its Claim for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement (IBM's 10th Counterclaim) [785] [Article] [838-A] [838-B] [Article] Memo in opposition [PDF] redacted Notice of conventional filing [PDF] March 7 2007 [Hearing and Part 2; Transcript] pending
SCO Motion for SJ on SCO's Third Cause of Action for Breach of Contract [775] [Article] [821] [Article] [883] [Article; text.] Notice of conventional filing [PDF] Report from the courtroom March 1, 2007 [ Transcript] pending
SCO Motion for SJ on IBM's Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Counterclaims [776] [Article] [820] [Article] [882 ] [Article] [Text] Notice of conventional filing [PDF] March 7, 2007 [Hearing and Part 2; Transcript] pending
SCO Motion for SJ on IBM's Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Counterclaims [777] [Article] [794] [Article] [Text] [881] [Article] [Text] Reply memorandum March 7 2007 [Hearing and Part 2; Transcript] pending


  


Table of Summary Judgment Motions | 58 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections
Authored by: Simon G Best on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 09:05 PM EST

Corrections here, please, if there are any.

---
NO SOFTWARE PATENTS - AT ALL!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off-Topic
Authored by: Simon G Best on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 09:07 PM EST

Off-topic stuff here, please.

As usual, see the stuff just below the comment form for permitted HTML, and don't forget to post in HTML mode for those links :-)

---
NO SOFTWARE PATENTS - AT ALL!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Memorandum in Opposition
Authored by: The Mad Hatter r on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 10:45 PM EST


So TSCOG has filed FIVE (5) sealed memorandums in opposition, and hasn't
supplied the redacted versions yet. Maybe they don't have enough lawyers to do
the redaction. Maybe they are scared to do the redaction - after all who knows
what we'll do with it...

Hum, that thought make me feel a bit better, but I'd really like to see the full
filings, and have them publicly available. Of course there's no advantage to
either BSF or TSCOG in allowing this, thought I suspect that IBM would find this
quite amusing.

IBM appears to have filed redacted copies of everything. Of course IBM actually
pays their lawyers.


---
Wayne

http://urbanterrorist.blogspot.com/

[ Reply to This | # ]

Table of Summary Judgment Motions
Authored by: electron on Friday, December 22 2006 @ 10:49 PM EST
While it is nice to see such a chart as this, why are all the reply memoranda
showing as being due on the 1st of December 2007?



---
Electron

"A life? Sounds great! Do you know where I could download one?"

[ Reply to This | # ]

News Pick Comments Here
Authored by: webster on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 12:24 AM EST
.
In case your ineterested.

---
webster

[ Reply to This | # ]

Table of Summary Judgment Motions
Authored by: Nivag on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 02:10 AM EST
'01/12/07'

is that '1st December 2007'?

[ Reply to This | # ]

What needs to be done?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 07:59 AM EST
I'd like to help out and transcribe some stuff. Is there a list of pdfs I could
choose from and mark it "in work"?

cb

[ Reply to This | # ]

Table of Summary Judgment Motions
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 23 2006 @ 01:42 PM EST
X

[ Reply to This | # ]

    Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Comments are owned by the individual posters.

    PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )