decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
SCO's Financial Figures: Same Arrow Pointing the Same Way. Down.
Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 06:16 PM EDT

It's those dratted legal expenses again, I think, although they are down a bit, but still in the millions this quarter. "Because of the unique and unpredictable nature of this litigation, the occurrence and timing of litigation-related expenses is difficult to predict, and will be difficult to predict in the future," they say in their press release.

Legal fees were capped, but lawyers don't pay their own expenses. Evah. Then too, there's all the experts and then this arbitration thingie and one thing and another, and whammo. Net loss. Oh, and revenue is down, too compared to the same quarter a year ago.

"The decrease in revenue and increase in net loss were primarily attributable to continued competitive pressures on the Company's UNIX products and services," their press release says. Also, everybody hates their litigious ways. Well. Maybe not *everybody*. Couldn't that be it, though? I think that might be the problem, but they never listen to me. They are, they say, "moving forward" with their UNIX solutions and mobile services strategy and remain committed to defending their precious intellectual property through the legal process.

If they have any "intellectual property". And if they can find it someday. And then ID it. And point it out to the judge with specificity. And then prove it and all that.

Now that I think of it, maybe that's the fundamental problem. You think?

********************************

The SCO Group Announces Third Quarter Fiscal 2006 Results

LINDON, Utah, Sept. 6

/PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The SCO Group, Inc., a leading provider of UNIX(R) software technology and mobile services, today reported results for its third quarter ended July 31, 2006.

Revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 was $7,421,000 as compared to $9,353,000 for the comparable quarter of the prior year. The net loss for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 was $(3,580,000), or $(0.17) per diluted common share, as compared to a net loss of $(2,372,000), or $(0.13) per diluted common share, for the comparable quarter of the prior year. The decrease in revenue and increase in net loss were primarily attributable to continued competitive pressures on the Company's UNIX products and services.

Legal and other expenses incurred in connection with the Company's litigation were $2,315,000 for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, which was down from costs of $3,085,000 for the third quarter of fiscal year 2005 and down from costs of $3,762,000 for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. Because of the unique and unpredictable nature of this litigation, the occurrence and timing of litigation-related expenses is difficult to predict, and will be difficult to predict in the future.

"While competition continues to be difficult for us in the operating systems business, we are moving forward with our UNIX solutions and mobile services strategy, as we believe that the market, as well as the benefits to our customers and partners, is significant," said Darl McBride, president and CEO of The SCO Group. "The Company has made important strides in the development and deployment of its Me Inc. mobile services and development platform. We remain committed to our UNIX business, introducing new mobile services to the marketplace and defending our intellectual property through the legal process."

Revenue for the nine months ended July 31, 2006 was $21,890,000 as compared to $27,476,000 for the nine months ended July 31, 2005. The net loss for the nine months ended July 31, 2006 was $(12,855,000), or $(0.62) per diluted common share, as compared to a net loss of $(7,295,000), or $(0.41) per diluted common share, for the nine months ended July 31, 2005. Cash and cash equivalents, available-for-sale marketable securities and restricted cash to be used for certain legal expenses totaled $15,521,000 as of July 31, 2006.

The Company's Business

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company introduced new products and solutions to the market from both its UNIX and mobile services groups. This included the introduction of SCO H.A. Clusters for SCO OpenServer 6, as well as updates to SCO OpenServer 6 and SCOoffice Server.

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company launched initiatives that should benefit the Company's mobile services platform over the coming quarters. One initiative is a developer challenge that is designed to incent developers from around the world to begin developing mobile applications that will run on the Company's Me Inc. mobile platform. Many developers signed up for this challenge and also participated in a number of developer specific break out sessions at the Company's annual SCO Forum conference that was held in early August 2006.

As a second initiative and to assist developers in the creation of mobile applications, the Company has introduced the Me Inc. Toolkit, which includes many of the essential tools needed for helping developers jump-start their mobile application development projects. In addition, the Company has established industry partnerships with such companies as Palm(R) and Microsoft(R) that will allow the Company to extend the Me Inc. development tools to a broader set of developers with established development skills, including those that use Microsoft Visual Studio(R).

Conference Call

As previously announced, The SCO Group will host a conference call at 5:00 p.m. EDT today, September 6, 2006, to discuss the fiscal third quarter results. To participate in the teleconference, please call toll free 1-800-967-7140 or use the toll number 1-719-457-2629; confirmation code: 2529843, approximately five minutes prior to the time stated above. A listen-only Webcast of the call will be broadcast live with a replay available the following day. The Webcast and replay may be accessed from http://ir.sco.com/events.cfm.

Forward-Looking Statements

The statements contained in this press release regarding (i) the Company's progress with its UNIX solutions and mobile services strategy, and its potential market, (ii) the Company's commitment to its strategy of strengthening its UNIX business, introducing new mobile services to the marketplace and defending its intellectual property through the legal process, (iii) the benefits that the Company expects to receive relating to the launch of its mobile services platform, and (iv) the Company's expectation that its industry partnerships will allow it to extend the Me Inc. Toolkit to a broader set of developers, that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements and are made under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties. We wish to advise readers that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, continued competitive pressure on the Company's operating system products which could impact the Company's results of operations, increased or unforeseen legal costs related to the Company's litigation, the inability to devote sufficient resources to the development and marketing of the Company's products, and the possibility that companies with whom the Company has formed partnerships will decide to terminate, or reduce the resources devoted to, their partnership with the Company. These and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated are discussed in more detail in the Company's periodic and current filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, and its subsequent Forms 10-Q. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and The SCO Group undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after such date.

About The SCO Group

The SCO Group is a leading provider of UNIX software technology and mobile services, offering SCO OpenServer for small to medium business, UnixWare for enterprise applications, and Me Inc. for mobile services. SCO's highly innovative and reliable solutions help millions of customers grow their businesses everyday, from SCO OpenServer on main street to UnixWare on Wall Street, and beyond. SCO owns the core UNIX operating system, originally developed by AT&T/Bell Labs and is the exclusive licensor to UNIX-based system software providers.

Headquartered in Lindon, Utah, SCO has a worldwide network of thousands of resellers and developers. SCO Global Services provides reliable localized support and services to partners and customers. For more information on SCO products and services, visit http://www.sco.com.

SCO, SCO OpenServer, Me Inc. and the associated SCO logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of The SCO Group, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. UNIX and UnixWare are registered trademarks of The Open Group. All other brand or product names are or may be trademarks of, and are used to identify products or services of, their respective owners.

                  Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
                          (unaudited, in thousands)

                                                       July 31,     October 31,
                                                         2006          2005
    Assets:
    Cash and cash equivalents                           $8,861         $4,272
      Restricted cash                                    2,010          5,690
      Available-for-sale marketable securities           5,099          6,165
      Accounts receivable, net                           4,072          6,343
      Other                                              1,720          2,454
          Total current assets                          21,762         24,924
    Property and equipment, net                            610            578
    Intangibles, net                                       677          2,707
    Other                                                  423            739
          Total assets                                 $23,472        $28,948

    Liabilities:
      Accounts payable                                  $2,239         $2,197
      Accrued payroll and other expenses                 4,821          5,774
      Deferred revenue                                   2,875          3,841
      Other                                              1,956          4,443
          Total current liabilities                     11,891         16,255
    Long-term liabilities                                  227            338
    Common stock subject to rescission                      --          1,018
    Stockholders' equity                                11,354         11,337
          Total liabilities and stockholders' equity   $23,472        $28,948



             Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
               (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)

                                  Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                       July 31,                 July 31,
                                   2006        2005         2006        2005

    Products revenue              $6,201      $7,953      $17,904     $23,095
    SCOsource licensing revenue       31          32           95         132
    Services revenue               1,189       1,368        3,891       4,249
      Total revenue                7,421       9,353       21,890      27,476
    Cost of products revenue         478         695        1,559       1,902
    Cost of SCOsource licensing
     revenue                       2,315       3,085       10,087       9,467
    Cost of services revenue         666         700        2,012       2,195
      Total cost of revenue        3,459       4,480       13,658      13,564
      Gross margin                 3,962       4,873        8,232      13,912
    Operating expenses:
      Sales and marketing          3,111       2,935        8,656       8,849
      Research and development     2,029       1,940        5,786       6,145
      General and administrative   1,829       1,647        5,139       5,446
      Amortization of intangibles    593         593        1,778       1,779
         Total operating expenses  7,562       7,115       21,359      22,219
    Loss from operations          (3,600)     (2,242)     (13,127)     (8,307)
    Equity in income (loss)
     of affiliate                     --         (19)          (8)         51
    Other income (expense), net      127         (27)         588       1,282
    Loss before provision for
     income taxes                 (3,473)     (2,288)     (12,547)     (6,974)
    Provision for income taxes      (107)        (84)        (308)       (321)
    Net loss                     $(3,580)    $(2,372)    $(12,855)    $(7,295)
    Basic and diluted net loss
     per common share             $(0.17)     $(0.13)      $(0.62)     $(0.41)
    Weighted average basic and
     diluted common shares
     outstanding                  21,063      17,993       20,703      17,885



  


SCO's Financial Figures: Same Arrow Pointing the Same Way. Down. | 167 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Off-topic here please
Authored by: overshoot on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 06:38 PM EDT
Clicky previewed HTML links and all that goodness are appreciated.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Corrections
Authored by: overshoot on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 06:41 PM EDT
If any. After all, even PJ makes mistakes sometimes.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Looks like 3 quarters of liquidity left
Authored by: hardmath on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 06:47 PM EDT

If the burn rate for the last quarter is typical, something in excess of $4M,
tSCOg's engine should be sputtering by mid-2007.

[What? You say that's not sputtering? It's the sound of the PIPE fairy's wings,
fluttering in the wind? Stranger things have been known to happen...]

--hm




---
Please be honest with us as trust is our watchword in this transaction. (a
Senior Credit Officer, sharing vast sums of money owed to a deceased client)

[ Reply to This | # ]

"Because of the unique and unpredictable nature of this litigation"?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 06:54 PM EDT
What is unpredictable about it? I think we've done a pretty good job of
predicting what is going to happen.

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's Financial Figures: Same Arrow Pointing the Same Way. Down.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 07:15 PM EDT
The most interesting part, to my eyes (Not an accountant) is the decrease in
SCOSource licensing from last year... around a 30% decrease.

Granted, it's a paltry sum, really (thousands, in a company that has almost
everything else in the millions range), but that great of a change in what was
touted as a major part of their business has to look pretty bad to their
stockholders.

- Nos

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO product and service revenue
Authored by: stats_for_all on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 07:21 PM EDT
A correlation of SCOX's product and service revenue points out the peculiar nature of results from 4Q 2003-- when approximately $2MM more product revenue was recieved than was supported by the typical service contracts.

If phantom sales of product were a suspicion, then obviously, 4Q 2003--an important time in the SCOX suit-- would be the first place to audit.

[ Reply to This | # ]

The Value Of SCO
Authored by: UglyGreenTroll on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 07:47 PM EDT
What is SCO worth? They have about $12 million in cash, plus whatever you can get for the UNIX business. The value of the legal claims I shall set to zero.

The UNIX business generated about $6 million last quarter, but this is dropping fast. In direct competition with Linux, UNIX is a dying business. Let's be (perhaps wildly) optimistic, then, and say that they could reap $20 million in cash from the UNIX business if they immediately went into "harvest" mode (that is, milk it for maximum profits without reinvesting).

This leaves a value of about $30 million. The number of shares outstanding is 21 million, giving a value of about $1.5 per share, as opposed to today's closing price of $2.24.

The problem with this assessment is that (1) SCO doesn't seem to want to go into "harvest mode". They continue to invest in software which, due to their toxic reputation, is impossible to market. (2) They continue to spend heavily on litigation.

In other words, if they were to immediately liquidate they might be worth a buck or two. Since they don't seem to be so inclined, I put their value at $0.00.

This suggests they are overvalued. The only thing holding them up is that some investors apparently believe the legal claims are worth something. Such an ephemeral basis for value creates volatility. I agree with a previous post - SCO is in dire danger of having their share price fall too low and being delisted.

I shoulda sold when it was at $18.

[ Reply to This | # ]

How about the money they owe Novell?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 08:31 PM EDT
It seems to me that they have millions of dollars of Novell's money. That
doesn't seem to be accounted for on the balance sheet and they don't seem to
mention it in their statements.

IIRC Novell has asked the for an audit of SCO's books, which their contract
permits, so they can determine if SCO is in compliance with said contract, but
they haven't been able to do it. I don't understand why Judge K. hasn't ordered
the audit. The license revenues belong to Novell (except for 5%)and SCO holds
them as a trust. SCO seems to have stolen Novell's money and they aren't being
punished for it.

Isn't Darl personally responsible for errors in this announcement? Is he in
danger of going to jail for theft?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Risk statement -- notable absence
Authored by: whoever57 on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 09:13 PM EDT
The risk statement makes no mention that SCO might have a judgement against it
that could cause bankruptcy. For example, Novell's motion to put the Sun and MS
license payment amounts into escrow.

Surely this should be mentioned as a specific risk and without this, are they
not violating some law?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Bleak?
Authored by: philc on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 09:59 PM EDT
"Bleak" is a far to cheerful, happy, and up beat description of this
financial report...

The loss of service revenue means that their installed base is shrinking. People
are not keeping the old product around and just buying service. This is much
worse than just delaying a purchase.

Customers that look at these financial reports will have a hard time believing
SCO will be around to service their products. Why buy from a dying company with
a proprietary offering that will die with the company? Companies want to buy
solutions, not problems.

Not only is the new Unix and Me Inc products not selling, their customers are
actively getting rid of what they have. The timing of this is about right since
businesses will depriciate assets over 3-5 years and move on to another vendor.
This also gives them time to port to a new platform. So in the end they pull the
plug and toss SCO into the dumpster.

Also, the legal expenses will get higher if they succeed in delaying the trial
and activating the RedHat suit.

If they lose the arbitration (which will come in much sooner than the trials) it
will be very hard to sell their extortion program. SCOsource is already flat
lined. SCO is trying for a Lazarus act in court.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Credit Officer
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 10:11 PM EDT
I worked as a credit officer in a past life. One interesting thing I note
(besides the usual) is that they have really cleaned up and gone straighter with
their disclosures / pr.

Ie, they are no longer a leading unix provider. They are giving straightup
financials and putting losses in the first paragraph. I wonder if they may know
that the storm is coming, and be looking to avoid a lot of puffery before
potential bad news.

The APA seems very clear on the Novell money as well, interesting that hasn't
been pushed harder by novell. It would really punch a hole in their cash
postion.

[ Reply to This | # ]

YYY222
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 10:12 PM EDT
Could not have said it better myself.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Another one? * blink * * blink *
Authored by: TheBlueSkyRanger on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 10:27 PM EDT
Seems identical to the one under the HP article. What is this supposed to be,
anyway?

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's Financial Figures: Same Arrow Pointing the Same Way. Down.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 10:42 PM EDT
I just want to give a special thanks to PJ for staying on
top of this sco stuff.

I personally don't know how she does it.

Day in Day out of the same drudgery of constantly
reporting the sco bad news.

maybe someday sco will actually show some actual code that
they think is their intellectual property.

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • They did - Authored by: tyche on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 11:29 PM EDT
Yes, you too...
Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 10:44 PM EDT
can become an expert Frontpage programmer in just 24 hours...

---
"There is nothing unexplainable, only that which has yet to be explained." --Dr.
Who

[ Reply to This | # ]

mood on the conference call
Authored by: dcf on Wednesday, September 06 2006 @ 11:21 PM EDT
When they paused for questions on the conference call, there was a full minute
of silence, interupted only by the moderator repeating the instructions on how
to ask a question, before the first question. That's consistent with the recent
behavior of the stock price - no one seems interested in SCO.

Darl sounded tired. He talked about being excited that they are nearing trial,
but he didn't sound excited; the primary reason he gave for being excited was so
SCO could get it behind them and move on to their exciting mobile opportunities.
No mention of the billions of dollars in damages they hope to collect.

Darl also said that SCO can't seriously invest in their mobile technologies yet
because they need to preserve their limited cash flow for legal expenses. Does
that sound like a good strategic plan for getting into a hot new market? Even
assuming that their mobile platform has a unique competitive advantage, how long
could they maintain that headstart if they don't have the cash to invest?

[ Reply to This | # ]

PJ, please watch your mouth..er, keyboard
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 07 2006 @ 03:42 AM EDT
Please be aware that the word "drat", although a harmless expression
akin to "phooey" in the USA, is a "bad word" in
British-style English. It is a contraction of "God rot" and is used
much like a USA expression referring to a ummm.... divine hydroelectric
facility.

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's Financial Figures: Same Arrow Pointing the Same Way. Down.
Authored by: blacklight on Thursday, September 07 2006 @ 07:42 AM EDT
SCOG took a 25% decrease in revenues compared to the same quarter last year,
leading to a 50% increase in losses compared to the same quarter last year.
Given that SCOG's margin on its Unixware software is around 90%, this tells me
that SCOG has not been successful in either rounding up new customers or getting
existing customers to upgrade.

I see that SCOG's G&A ($1 mil this quarter) are low, given that Darl the
Snarl's salary alone is $1 mil a year - I assume that the salaries of the top
management personnel are spread over several categories such as Marketing and
R&D.

On the plus side, both their business and litigation prospects are hopeless. And
unless they can prove in court that they own UNIX, they have no intellectual
property to speak of. The best companies like SCOG can hope for is to be
acquired, but its name is under a cloud and its reputation is mud. The good news
for SCOG's shareholders is that Captain Darl is not leading his ship into an
iceberg. The bad news is that his ship is drifting into the center of a
whirlpool - and his ship ain't a submarine.


---
Know your enemies well, because that's the only way you are going to defeat
them. And know your friends even better, just in case they become your enemies.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Curious use of parentheses...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 07 2006 @ 10:15 AM EDT
to indicate negative numbers. And then they are not all that consistent either: as compared to a net loss of $(2,372,000), where the loss is actually a positive number but a negative profit, versus for instance Legal and other expenses incurred in connection with the Company's litigation were $2,315,000, where there is also arguably the matter of negative income.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Many Developers
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 07 2006 @ 01:25 PM EDT
"One initiative is a developer challenge that is designed to incent developers from around the world to begin developing mobile applications that will run on the Company's Me Inc. mobile platform. Many developers signed up for this challenge and also participated in a number of developer specific break out sessions..." (emphasis added)

So, now we know they have "many" developers. But how many is "many"? And why do they use a general term like "many" anyway?

If it were more than 2000, you know they'd have said "thousands".
If it were more than 1000, of course they would have said "over a thousand".
If it were more than 200, I'm sure they would have said "hundreds".
If it were more than 100, they probably would have said "over a hundred".
If it were more than 24, they might have said "dozens", but that's where I think it starts sounding so unimpressive that they probably would have bailed out and started saying "many".

So, what do y'all think? Is it less than 24, or just less than 100?

And which line of the balance sheet would that $1000 gift for developers attending the SCO Forum have come from?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )