decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
SCO's letter agreement re escrow account
Thursday, June 08 2006 @ 11:05 PM EDT

Here's the new letter agreement between SCO Group and Boies Schiller about topping off the escrow account, just filed with the SEC. It seems they put $5 million more in the kitty. Note number 4. Lawyers always make sure they get paid, as I've told you many times. And frankly, they need to, because when people are in trouble, they are very interested in paying for help; but when it's over, it can be harder to motivate a client to pay a bill, so the lawyers naturally don't want to be left holding expenses in their hands and having to pay them out-of-pocket. Here, the firms are sure to be paid for any expenses.

When I show you IBM's new filing, in the next article, you'll probably be able to figure out why more money is needed, even in the IBM litigation, let alone the Novell arbitration and lawsuit.

***************************

EXHIBIT 99.1

The SCO Group, Inc.
[address]

June 5, 2006

Mr. David Boies
Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
[address]

Re: First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Letter Agreement dated October 31, 2004 (the “Original Letter Agreement”) among The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”), Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP (“BSF”), Kevin McBride, and Berger Singerman (together, the “Three Original Firms”)

Dear Mr. Boies:

As we have discussed, pursuant to the Original Letter Agreement, the Company was obligated to deposit at least $5 million into an escrow account (the “Escrow Account”) for the payment of any expert, consulting and other expenses (including out-of-pocket expenses of all law firms working on the SCO Litigation (as defined in the Original Letter Agreement)) approved by BSF. Because much of the initial $5 million deposited into the Escrow Account has been utilized for the payment of expert, consulting and other expenses, the Company and the Three Original Firms desire to amend the Original Agreement to provide for a mechanism to increase the money in the Escrow Account in the event that the Company and BSF mutually agree to increase the amount of such money.

Accordingly, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Original Letter Agreement, the Company and the Three Original Firms desire to amend the Original Letter Agreement as follows:

1. In the event that the Company and BSF from time to time mutually agree in writing that it is necessary to replenish the money in the Escrow Account, the Company will replenish the Escrow Account in the amount mutually agreed upon by the Company and BSF;

2. The Company and BSF mutually agree that the Escrow Account initially will be replenished in the amount of $5 million, which money will be deposited by the Company into the Escrow Account within a reasonable period of time after the date hereof; and

3. Any money remaining in the Escrow Account after the completion of the work contemplated in the Original Letter Agreement will be returned to the Company; provided, however, that before such money is returned to the Company, the Company will have paid all approved expenses contemplated in the Original Letter Agreement and in this Amendment that are to be paid from the Escrow Account.

Except as set forth herein, this Amendment does not alter the terms or conditions of the Original Letter Agreement.

This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute the same agreement.

If the terms of this Amendment are agreeable, please so indicate by signing below and returning this letter to Bert B. Young at The SCO Group, Inc., [address].

Sincerely,

By: /s/ Darl C. McBride
Darl C. McBride
Chief Executive Officer

Agreed and Accepted this 5th day of June, 2006.

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
By: /s/ Stuart Singer
Name: Stuart Singer
Title: Partner

BERGER SINGERMAN

By: /s/ Mitch Berger
Name: Mitch Berger
Title: President

/s/ Kevin McBride
Kevin McBride


  


SCO's letter agreement re escrow account | 38 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
SCO's letter agreement re escrow account
Authored by: tredman on Thursday, June 08 2006 @ 11:31 PM EDT
What #4?

---
Tim
"I drank what?" - Socrates, 399 BCE

[ Reply to This | # ]

Corrections
Authored by: dwandre on Thursday, June 08 2006 @ 11:31 PM EDT
So PJ can find them...

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • 4 should be 3. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 02:54 PM EDT
Off Topic here
Authored by: webster on Thursday, June 08 2006 @ 11:47 PM EDT

So PJ can find them...

---
webster

[ Reply to This | # ]

BERGER SINGERMAN
Authored by: sk43 on Thursday, June 08 2006 @ 11:52 PM EDT
Does anyone know what this firm does? Leonard Samuels and Fred Goldberg, in
particular?

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's letter agreement re escrow account
Authored by: XORisOK on Thursday, June 08 2006 @ 11:55 PM EDT
PJ... When I show you IBM's new filing, in the next article, you'll probably be
able to figure out why more money is needed, even in the IBM litigation, let
alone the Novell arbitration and lawsuit.

Good tease. I will be up all night lookiing! :^)

---
Cogito Ergo ZOOM - "I think, Therefore I drive fast!"

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's letter agreement re escrow account
Authored by: Zarkov on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 12:42 AM EDT
A question on the mechanisms of control over these typs of escrow account....

Would it be possible for these types of accounts to be used as 'slush funds' by
which someone could move large amounts of cash out of the business?

From just looking at the agreement my first thought was that there is nothing
stopping BSF using this fund to sidestep the cap on their fees... it seems that
as long as BSF ask for more money to be deposited in the account, SCOX are
happpy to do that.

So who decides what the money gets spent on? And when?

[ Reply to This | # ]

you imply SCO's trouble can ever cease?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 02:17 AM EDT
Only after they closed the bankrupcy and fraud cases :)
Sure, the lawyers wanna get paid should those happen.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Note what number 4?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 03:59 AM EDT
Like posted earlier, I too wonder what number 4 PJ is refering to. Is it a typo
and supposed to maybe be a "3" or am I missing something?

[ Reply to This | # ]

legal expenses going forward
Authored by: dcf on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 09:41 AM EDT
Given that the letter is dated June 5, the $5 million dollar payment would not
have been included in the just-released results for their fiscal second quarter
which ended April 30.

For SCO's fiscal Q1 (ending Jan 31, 2006), cost of SCOsource revenue (presumably
primarily expenses related to the trials) were $4 million, including the final
$2 million fixed payment towards their lawyers fees. For fiscal Q2, that cost
was $3.76 million, so the non-fee portion nearly doubled. Next quarter, it will
apparently be at least $5 million.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Is it $5 million more or just back up to $5 million in escrow
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 09 2006 @ 09:29 PM EDT
I haven't read anything that says they made a $5 million payment. Only that
they agreed to replenish the $5 million escrow account. We'll know when we see
the 10-Q due to be filed with the SEC by June 15 (always due by the 45th
calendar after the quarter end, except it's the 90th day for the 4th quarter,
i.e., the 10-K).

The 10-Q breaks out the restricted cash due to Novell so that we can see what
how much was left at April 30 for out-of-pocket legal expenses. SCO's payment
escrow payment would only be $5 million if all the restricted cash was due to
Novell. On the other hand, if they recorded nothing as being due to Novell,
then they'd only have to pay less than $2 million to replenish the escrow
account back up to the $5 million escrow level.

Of course, I could have missed something.

nealywilly

[ Reply to This | # ]

Sam Palmisano Deposition: Did it Happen Yet?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 11 2006 @ 01:04 PM EDT
There's been no mention/discussion regarding BSF's deposition of Sam Palmisano
-- yet it must have occurred already, from the discovery schedule.

I was expecting that, if David Boies was ever going to make his grand appearance
before trial, it would be for the Sam deposition. That is, after all, his
primary (in my estimation, his only) strength/skill as a litigator.

So -- do we know anything? Did it happen at all?

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's letter agreement re escrow account
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 13 2006 @ 12:38 AM EDT
Actually, this says nothing about the lawyers getting paid. It says that the escrow account is for "expert, consulting and other expenses (including out-of-pocket expenses of all law firms working on the SCO Litigation[)]". Noticeable absent is any mention of attorney's fees. There is a separate agreement for the attorney's fees. February 26, 2003 engagement letter between SCO and Boies, Schiller The escrow account is just the attorneys making sure they do not get stuck with the litigation expenses.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )