decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
FL Judge Throws Boies Schiller Off a Case, and More
Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 04:05 PM EDT

Law.com has the news. Remember the Florida case, where Boies Schiller undertook to represent a woman who became the firm's Chief Financial Officer, Amy Habie? On the other side, for years, has been a pro se litigant, Scott Lewis, a gardener. Boies Schiller, according to the judge, has a conflict in representing Habie and her company, which is limiting its independent professional judgment. He has barred the firm from further representation of Ms. Habie and her gardening company, Nical.

And that's not all:

Gerber also found Nical in contempt of court for violating court orders, and that H. Stephen Rash, an attorney at Boies Schiller & Flexner in Miami, was the company's "agent" in violating the orders. He ordered Bilton [Patrick Bilton, Habie's partner in the company] to serve 30 days in jail for contempt and to pay a $500 fine. Gerber found that Rash and Nical breached orders by issuing subpoenas for witnesses without the permission of the court and by failing to notify Lewis about the scheduling of depositions.

Boies, the article says, didn't charge fees. Instead he took a 25% interest in Habie's business, in trust for his children:

In a deposition, Habie said that she had accepted $100,000 for the 25 percent stake.

In all, the Boies firm's representation of Habie and Nical has totaled over $5 million in gifted services, according to an accountant Lewis deposed as an expert witness.

Habie's professional relationship with Boies began in 1992, when her divorce lawyer, a law school acquaintance of Boies, asked Boies to help in a custody battle Habie was waging with her ex-husband, Guatamelan textile executive Jose Habie. In 2000, Habie became the chief financial officer of Boies' law firm. According to court documents, her current salary from the law firm is $160,000 a year plus bonus and benefits.

According to court papers, Boies' law firm and a total of 75 lawyers from 10 other law firms have provided more than 15,000 pro bono hours in the case representing Nical and Habie. He's never publicly explained why he and his firm represented Habie and her company without charging fees.

The judge in his decision cited a Florida Bar rule that says "a lawyer shall not represent a client if the lawyer's exercise of independent professional judgment in the representation of that client may be materially limited by ... the lawyer's own interest."

The Palm Beach Daily News has more detail on the case here:

In addition, Gerber the ninth judge in the case ordered high-profile attorney David Boies' law firm dismissed from the case for issuing subpoenas without court approval. The ruling says that attorney H. Stephen Rash of Boies, Schiller & Flexner "intentionally violated this court's predecessors' orders."

Nine judges in nine years. And you thought SCO v. IBM was taking a long time. Can you imagine intentionally violating a court order? A spokesman for Boies Schiller is quoted as saying the subpoena business was an "oversight". This judge obviously didn't think so. The decision is being appealed. You might also like to read Forbes' article on Boies and the AIG case.


  


FL Judge Throws Boies Schiller Off a Case, and More | 102 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
And about time too
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 04:28 PM EDT
What was not mentioned in the article was the *REAL* reason Boise and Schiller
where sent packing ...

Florida has man local ordanaces regarding the keeping of pet sharks :)

--

Im first!

[ Reply to This | # ]

FL Judge Throws Boies Schiller Off a Case, and More
Authored by: inode_buddha on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 04:40 PM EDT
" Nine judges in nine years. And you thought SCO v. IBM was taking a long time. "

Well, PJ. During my recent travels, I took some photos of cornfields in Kansas, in case we need some popcorn for the SCO cases. :-D

---
-inode_buddha
Copyright info in bio

"When we speak of free software,
we are referring to freedom, not price"
-- Richard M. Stallman

[ Reply to This | # ]

Standard OT threads
Authored by: overshoot on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 04:48 PM EDT
Please post clickable links: <a
href="http://www.example.com/">Like this</a> in HTML mode.
Checking your work is always a good idea.

[ Reply to This | # ]

NULLS
Authored by: Tim Ransom on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 05:51 PM EDT
>>"a lawyer shall not represent a client if the lawyer's exercise of
independent professional judgment in the representation of that client may be
materially limited by ... the lawyer's own interest."<<

Ha! So it's *illegal to practice law* in Florida!

Who knew?

---
Thanks again,

[ Reply to This | # ]

Wow
Authored by: RealProgrammer on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 06:05 PM EDT
"Boies' law firm and a total of 75 lawyers from 10 other law firms have
provided more than 15,000 pro bono hours..."

Something smells.

I bet the American Red Cross doesn't get 15,000 pro bono hours. I doubt the
Special Olympics gets that much free lawyer time. Habitat for Humanity ... the
list goes on. Maybe the ACLU, ACLJ, or some of the big lobbies get that kind of
time donated.

Wow.



---
(I'm not a lawyer, but I know right from wrong)

[ Reply to This | # ]

And I was wondering....
Authored by: Latesigner on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 07:43 PM EDT
how a firm with Boise as a partner ended up with the SCO case.


---
The only way to have an "ownership" society is to make slaves of the rest of us.

[ Reply to This | # ]

November 2004 Vanity Fair Article
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 07:50 PM EDT
November 2004 issue of Vanity Fair had an article by Boies himself about the
original Habie divorce case. I can't find the article on the net, though.
Quite an interesting story.

From my memory, I remember that Boies was originally working the same firm as
Marriot when he started on the Habie case. When he left that firm, he got the
case to go along with it.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Question relating to Boies and SCOX
Authored by: tiger99 on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 07:50 PM EDT
I may be quite wrong here, but I was under the impression that BSF were somehow being paid in SCOX shares, if they win, which is unlikely. Now if this is so, are they breaking the same law? And should IBM be trying to get the case moved to Florida?

And as IANAL and might in any case have the facts totally wrong, is there any othe bit of conduct in the SCO cases that ought to result in BSF being kicked out by the judge?

[ Reply to This | # ]

minor correction
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 07:51 PM EDT
Mr Habie is "Guatemalan", a natural of Guatemala.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Could you define "violate"?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 08:04 PM EDT
"Can you imagine intentionally violating a court order?"

Violating, bending, ignoring, forgetting, distorting... all apparently the same
in BSF's playbook. Witness certain "renewed" motions to compel, that
ignore the fact that there was never an "original" order to do so, and
witness repeated expansion of the wording of certain judge's rulings regarding
said discovery. Not to mention all that "specificity" that Wells
ordered, and that IBM is still waiting for regarding what they are accused of.

Why change if it works. It took 9 years in that case for anything to get done,
so can we expect 7 more years of SCO before anything finally happens?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Oversights
Authored by: tangomike on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 08:37 PM EDT
are apparently a BS&F routine. Forgetting to notify the court about
subpoenas seems awfully similar to some oversights in TSCOG. Are these
'professionals' really that sloppy, or is this pattern part of their tactics?

---
Nothing screams 'poor workmanship' like wrinkles in the
duct tape.

[ Reply to This | # ]

FL Judge Throws Boies Schiller Off a Case, and More
Authored by: NastyGuns on Tuesday, May 03 2005 @ 08:49 PM EDT

For those that are interested, while I believe that the charges have now been dropped, Boies was at one point the subject of a Florida Bar Complaint.

I posted this information before here.

---
NastyGuns,
"If I'm not here, I've gone out to find myself. If I return before I get back, please keep me here." Unknown.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Another possible explanation?
Authored by: CnocNaGortini on Thursday, May 05 2005 @ 04:12 AM EDT
IANAD (I am not a detective) but one thing stands out to me as very plausibly
consistent with this extraordinary situation: could Boies be being blackmailed
over something?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Gossip from Habie//Boies case
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 05 2005 @ 10:35 AM EDT
This is a year end wrap up from 2000 about the Habie case. Has some juicy details.

Elsewhere, Habie also gets a quick gossip mention for a wild Bahama weekend she had with Boies, implying their relationship was more than professional.

The Nical business shows up in business licenses owning werehouse and greenhouses adjacent to the Miami airport. The implication is the business had something to do with importing plant materials.

A long rambling discourse on the scummy PI hired by Boies to investigate Sara Habie, matriarch of the Habie clan

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )