decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Odds and Ends -- Filings in SCO v. IBM
Thursday, February 03 2005 @ 01:54 AM EST

Here are some more documents scanned for you, to make our collection complete. Nothing exciting, except that the overall picture is clearer with each little piece. For one thing, we see that SCO finally began to do some discovery in October:

  • 325 - SCO's Notice of Deposition for David Bullis
  • 326 - SCO's Notice of Deposition for William Sandve
  • 359 - SCO's Certificate of Service of SCO's Fifth Request for Production of Documents
  • 367 - IBM's Certificate of Service re: [354] IBM's Subpoena Duces Tecum on Pointserve (This is the Pointserve Subpoena, but it also contains the Certificate of Service)
  • 371- SCO's Certificate of Service of SCO's Sixth Request for Production of Documents
  • 376 - IBM's Certificate of Service of IBM's Sixth Set of Interrogatories and Sixth Request for Production of Documents




  


Odds and Ends -- Filings in SCO v. IBM | 18 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Oh well, not much to correct here.
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 03 2005 @ 02:29 AM EST
Tasty morsels though.

[ Reply to This | # ]

OT Here Please
Authored by: Greebo on Thursday, February 03 2005 @ 02:42 AM EST
Items of Interest

---
PJ has permission to use my posts for commercial use.

[ Reply to This | # ]

how long, o lord
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 03 2005 @ 02:47 AM EST
How long is this farce going to drag on? Honest to gosh,
this makes Kafka look like an optimist.

I predict this will end rather abruptly, with the
bankruptcy of SCO and a shakeup in upper management. Darl
and his henchtoads are going to get the boot, and whatever
is left of the company will limp along awhile longer.
Novell might acquire it just to make things tidy and to
reclaim all the red Swingline staplers thieved by
Information Minister Blake Stowell.

Meanwhile IBM will keep it alive in the courts as long as
possible, which is their way of putting heads on pikes.
Don't mess with the big gorilla when all you have is a big
mouth.

--
Carla the country geek

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's answer to IBM's 3rd set of interrogatories
Authored by: codswallop on Thursday, February 03 2005 @ 03:45 AM EST
This is the important document, if you were to pick one. We're also missing
SCO's response to interrogatory 10 (obviously not the 10th interrogatory, since
we're only up to 6. Maybe it has to do with CC10). Also we don't have IBM's
responses to SCO's interrogatories.

---
IANAL This is not a legal opinion.
SCO is not a party to the APA.
Discovery relevance is to claims, not to sanity.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )