decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Pacer Entries on Red Hat and a Letter to the Judge in AutoZone
Wednesday, January 05 2005 @ 01:45 PM EST

Both sides have sent their letters to Judge Sue Robinson in the Red Hat case, as they must every 90 days, to bring her up-to-date on what is happening in the IBM lawsuit. We have made arrangements to obtain those as soon as they are available to the public. Delaware has its own system, and until the judge reads them and releases them, they are not available. But, soon. Meanwhile, here is the Pacer entry:

1/3/05 46 Letter to Judge Robinson from J. Blumenfeld summarizing the status of SCO v. IBM case pending before the Honorable Dale A. Kimball in the USDC for the District of Utah (ft)

1/3/05 47 Letter to Judge Robinson from J. Ingersoll re status of various related litigation matters (ft)

In AutoZone news, there was a letter from SCO sent to the judge that the court received yesterday. It has been forwarded to the judge's chambers. It isn't on Pacer, and ex parte communications are not imaged the way a motion would be on receipt. Ex parte communications are frowned on in Nevada, I'm told, precisely because they are not in the normal, public loop. We'll have to wait to see what has happened, so this is just to let you know that something has happened. I know some of you have been tracking deadlines and have been wondering if SCO plans on moving forward or not in this matter.


  


Pacer Entries on Red Hat and a Letter to the Judge in AutoZone | 89 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
OT: Request for documents in IBM case
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 05 2005 @ 02:08 PM EST
I noticed on Tuxrocks that SCO's responses to IBM's third set of interrogatories
is attached to several filings as an exhibit and doesn't appear to be sealed.

I think this would be an interesting document to see (if possible of course) as
it deals with SCO's affirmative defenses

Thanks
Quatermass
IANAL IMHO etc

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off Topic Responses Here, please.
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Wednesday, January 05 2005 @ 02:08 PM EST
And please include clickable URLs when appropriate.

---
The Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail

[ Reply to This | # ]

Corrections, etc.
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Wednesday, January 05 2005 @ 02:09 PM EST
You know the drill.

---
The Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail

[ Reply to This | # ]

Red Hat 45
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 05 2005 @ 02:10 PM EST
Has this (older letter) been published yet? If so, where?

45 - RedHat (Josy Ingersoll) Letter of October 2004 to Judge Robinson re: status
of various related litigation matters

Thanks
Quatermass
IANAL IMHO etc

[ Reply to This | # ]

Pacer Entries on Red Hat and a Letter to the Judge in AutoZone
Authored by: blacklight on Wednesday, January 05 2005 @ 04:34 PM EST
"In AutoZone news, there was a letter from SCO sent to the judge that the
court received yesterday. It has been forwarded to the judge's chambers. It
isn't on Pacer, and ex parte communications are not imaged the way a motion
would be on receipt."

I feel sorry for the judge, who has to bear the burden of the verbiage of SCOG's
special pleading on his lonesome shoulders. On the other hand, he "asked
for it" when he denied AZ's motion to have the trial moved to Tennessee, so
my empathy for him is rather limited.

My remembrance is that AZ made some specific discovery requests to SCOG at the
beginning of the 90-day limited discovery period, and I am not up to date on
whether SCOG complied with any of them. It is not clear to me that SCOG made any
discovery - er, fishing - requests to AZ either: I suspect that SCOG made none,
or there would have been fireworks from AZ.

[ Reply to This | # ]

OT: Lawsuits that went bad
Authored by: LarryVance on Wednesday, January 05 2005 @ 06:10 PM EST
Dumb Juries

---
NEVER UNDERESTIMATE YOUR INFLUENCE!
Larry Vance

[ Reply to This | # ]

Letter to the Judge in AutoZone
Authored by: mnichols on Thursday, January 06 2005 @ 07:17 AM EST
Maybe sco found out that the judge runs linux and they're giving him/her thirty
days to purchase their SCOSource License or face litigation;-)


Mojo

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )