|
|
| David Frasure's 1992 BSDi Deposition |
 |
|
Friday, October 22 2004 @ 04:13 PM EDT
|
Here's David Frasure's deposition in the BSDi case, from 1992. SCO presents it to the court and the media as an example of one of two IBM declarants contradicting himself. However, their argument, in my opinion, suffers from the same fatal flaw as it does with the 1992 Otis Wilson deposition. In both cases, the '92 depositions are talking about educational licenses, not commercial ones, so it looks to me like an apples to oranges comparison, not a contradiction.
I haven't finished reading this deposition yet -- it's about 226 pages long -- so I thought we could read it together. If you wish to compare, you can read David Frasure's declaration [ PDF] in the SCO v. IBM case and his deposition [PDF]. Needless to say, we have a lot of transcribing to do.
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 04:44 PM EDT |
Oh wait, that's me.
How about Corrections Here?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: skip on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 04:48 PM EDT |
Official "The SCO Group" Positions - 7 days without an offical post
Authored by: Skip on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 08:34 AM EDT
Main posts in this thread may only be made by senior managers or attorneys for
"The SCO Group". Main posts must use the name and position of the
poster at "The SCO Group". Main posters must post in their official
capacity at "The SCO Group".
Sub-posts will also be allowed from non-"The SCO Group" employees or
attorneys. Sub-posts from persons not connected with "The SCO Group"
must be very polite, address other posters and the main poster with the
honorific "Mr." or "Mrs." or "Ms.", as
appropriate, use correct surnames, not call names or suggest or imply unethical
or illegal conduct by "The SCO Group" or its employees or attorneys.
This thread requires an extremely high standard of conduct and even slightly
marginal posts will be deleted.
P.J. says you must be on your very best behavior.
If you want to comment on this thread, please post under "O/T"
---
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Mumbo, perhaps. Jumbo, perhaps not!"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: WojtekPod on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 04:50 PM EDT |
The commenter deleted his comment [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- That should be click here - Authored by: jaydee on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 04:52 PM EDT
- OK try this for a link - Authored by: jaydee on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 04:54 PM EDT
- OT posts here - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 05:03 PM EDT
- Groklaw in Google - Authored by: jcasares on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 05:08 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: sprag on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 05:27 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: Greebo on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 05:34 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: Groklaw Lurker on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 05:34 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: frk3 on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 05:44 PM EDT
- Merkey reads court documents - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 05:44 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: rand on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 06:12 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: cf on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 06:13 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and Groklaw - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 06:17 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: Paul Shirley on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 06:20 PM EDT
- [OT] My guess about what he's up to - Authored by: Jude on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 06:38 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey??? - Authored by: ihawk on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 08:01 PM EDT
- Send to Judge Wells - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 08:26 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: sprag on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 09:30 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: sprag on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 09:40 PM EDT
- [OT] Merkey and GPL buyout - Authored by: sprag on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 01:53 AM EDT
- Been using clean Linux for some time. - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 01:06 PM EDT
- The Register, Security Linux vrs Windows. - Authored by: Franki on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 06:32 PM EDT
- OT posts here - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 07:27 PM EDT
- Way off topic : A major hangup - Authored by: Jude on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 08:45 PM EDT
- Vanity Fair has excerpts from David Boies' new book. - Authored by: mandalay on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 10:24 PM EDT
- Microsoft speeches on Linux - Authored by: rharvey46 on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 11:02 PM EDT
- Merkey Saves The Day - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 11:59 PM EDT
- SCOX dropping at the nyse - Authored by: skip on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 12:19 AM EDT
- Why open source is unsustainable - Authored by: yellowsnow314159 on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 05:32 AM EDT
- OT posts here - Authored by: Chris Lingard on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 01:11 PM EDT
- [...] The memory sickness [...]
>>[...] I was experiencing [...]
>>[...] is constant [...] - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 02:51 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: skip on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 04:51 PM EDT |
should you wish to deviate from the party line :-)
(such behaviour being mandatory for FOSS)....
---
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Mumbo, perhaps. Jumbo, perhaps not!"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 04:54 PM EDT |
| Grrr... Two OT threads posted while making this one...
\Cyp [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Groklaw Lurker on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 05:42 PM EDT |
PJ, there are several calls for you to delete a post to the article;
"Dueling Studies on Security and TCO in Windows and Linux"
The post is near the bottom and is very, very objectionable. Please remove it.
---
(GL) Groklaw Lurker
End the tyranny, abolish software patents.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 05:55 PM EDT |
This one gets the prize for being hardest to read.
I think I have to print it our on big paper then try to decipher the pieces in
the center of the binding.
---
Rsteinmetz
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 22 2004 @ 07:02 PM EDT |
| When are we going to have a decision on CC10? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: josmith42 on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 10:04 AM EDT |
I'll transcribe a few pages, say 20-23, if noboby else lays a claim to them.
Let me know if you're already doing those.
James
---
Forty-two: the answer to the question of life, the universe, and everything.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: josmith42 on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 11:09 AM EDT |
I can't get enough! I'm doing p. 24-27 now. Again, let me know if you're
already doing that.
---
Forty-two: the answer to the question of life, the universe, and everything.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 11:17 AM EDT |
Maureen Ogara is now signing her articles
over at LinuxWorld with her photo. This
certainly makes her more convincing and
credible as an author compared to PJ.
Readers appreciate and trust journalists who
don't appear to be psuedonamis.
STUDENT OF JOURNALISM [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Ogara is more credible - Authored by: Jude on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 11:29 AM EDT
- Ogara is more credible - Authored by: brenda banks on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 11:32 AM EDT
- Ogara is more credible - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 11:45 AM EDT
- Ogara is more...something - Authored by: Adam B on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 11:50 AM EDT
- Ogara doesnt have the readership of P.J. I look for news so I am here. Not at linuxworld, not at - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 01:12 PM EDT
- Ogara is more credible - Authored by: John M. Horn on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 01:16 PM EDT
- Ogara is more credible - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 01:31 PM EDT
- Ogara is more credible - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 01:37 PM EDT
- How do you know the picture is really Ogara? (eom) - Authored by: gdeinsta on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 01:37 PM EDT
- And I can't find a job - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 02:11 PM EDT
- Ogara is more credible - Authored by: Pat Pending on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 02:40 PM EDT
- Ogara is more (cr)edible - Authored by: rand on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 02:55 PM EDT
- I will be ignoring this post with no photo... - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 03:09 PM EDT
- ha ha ha - i got the humour - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 03:16 PM EDT
- Ogara is more credible - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 03:30 PM EDT
- Pseudonami ? - Authored by: IrisScan on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 10:44 PM EDT
- Ogara is more credible - Authored by: blacklight on Sunday, October 24 2004 @ 03:22 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 02:27 PM EDT |
I guess they're trying to be the Alien Creatures Weekly of the computer world.
And their advertisers think we'll buy anything from them?
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: LarryVance on Saturday, October 23 2004 @ 06:43 PM EDT |
Ruth Rideout performed the studies for AT&T licensing.
---
IAAE - TGIANAL
Larry Vance[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
