decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The Novell Letters
Tuesday, November 11 2003 @ 03:28 AM EST

Here are the two Novell letters, which are attached as Exhibits to IBM's Amended Counterclaims from Novell's Jack Messman to Darl McBride. The first is dated June 6 and the second June 12, 2003. Thanks to the faithful Sorensons, for trekking to the courthouse to pick these up and then transcribing them.

Jack Messman
Chairman and CEO

Novell

June 9, 2003



Mr. Darl McBride
President and CEO
The SCO Group
355 South 520 West
Suite 100
Lindon, Utah 84042
VIA FACSIMILE AND CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Re: IBM SVRX Licenses

Dear Mr. McBride:

This letter is further to my letter of May 28, 2003 concerning SCO's campaign directed against the Linux community. SCO's response to that letter reinforces Novell's concerns. SCO continues to advance unsubstantiated charges, and to threaten actions taht would potentially injure Novell, Novell's customers, and the industry in general.

Recently, SCO has reiterated its threat to terminate IBM's SVRX license. Pursuant to Amendment No. X, however, Novell and SCO granted IBM the "irrevocable, fully paid-up, perpetual right" to exercise all of the rights under the IBM SVRX Licenses that IBM then held. IBM paid $10,125,000 for the rights under Amendment No. X. Novell believes, therefore, that SCO has no right to terminate IBM's SVRX Licenses, and that it is inappropriate, at best, for SCO to be threatening to do so.

Under Section 4.16(b) of the Asset Purchase Agreement Novell retains the right, at Novell's "sole discretion and direction," to require SCO to "amend, supplement, modify or waive any rights under, or ... assign any rights to, any SVRX License to the extent so directed in any manner or respect by [Novell]." That section further provides that to the extent SCO "shall fail to take any action concerning the SVRX Licenses" as directed by Novell, Novell "shall be authorized, and is hereby granted, the rights to take any action on [SCO's] own behalf."

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 4.16(b) of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Novell hereby directs SCO to waive any purported right SCO may claim to terminate IBM's SVRX Licenses enumerated in Amendment X or to revoke any rights thereunder, including any purported rights to terminate asserted in SCO's letter of March 6, 2003 to IBM. Novell directs SCO to take this action by noon, MDT, June 12, 2003, and to notify Novell that it has done so by that time.

Sincerely,
[signature of Jack L. Messman]

Jack L. Messman

*****************************************

Jack Messman
Chairman and CEO

Novell

VIA FACSIMILE AND CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED


June 12, 2003


Darl McBride
President and Chief Executive Officer
The SCO Group
355 South 520 West
Lindon, UT 84042

Ronald A. Lauderdale, Esq.
Vice-President, Assistant General Counsel
International Business Machines Corporation
Maildrop 4201
Route 100
Somers, N.Y. 10589

Re: IBM SVRX Licenses

Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the following:

  • Asset Purchase Agreement by and between The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. and Novell, Inc. dated as of September 19, 1995, and more particularly to Section 4.16(b) of that agreement;
  • Amendment No. X to Software Agreement SOFT-00015, et seq., between International Business Machines Corporation, The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc., and Novell, Inc;
  • Letter dated March 6, 2003 from The SCO Group to International Business Machines Corporation; and
  • Letter dated June 9, 2003 from Novell to The SCO Group regarding IBM SVRX Licenses.

In its June 9 letter to The SCO Group, Novell directed "SCO to waive any purported right SCO may claim to terminate IBM's SVRX Licenses enumerated in Amendment X or to revoke any rights thereunder, including any purported rights to terminate asserted in SCO's letter of March 6, 2003 to IBM." Novell directed SCO "to take this action by noon, MDT, June 12, 2003."

SCO has failed to take the action directed by Novell.

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 4.16(b) of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Novell, on behalf of The SCO Group, hereby waives any purported right SCO may claim to terminate IBM's SVRX Licenses enumerated in Amendment X or to revoke any rights thereunder, including any purported rights to terminate asserted in SCO's letter of March 6, 2003 to IBM.

Sincerely,

[signature of Jack L. Messman]
Jack L. Messman


  


The Novell Letters | 8 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Novell Letters
Authored by: stevem on Tuesday, November 11 2003 @ 04:37 AM EST
Totally minor. First para, first letter.
Currently have:
... threaten actions taht would potentially injure Novell ...

Presume should be:

... threaten actions that would potentially injure Novell ...


the "taht" is wrong.

Great Wwork tho!


- stevem

[ Reply to This | # ]

The Novell Letters
Authored by: keanu on Tuesday, November 11 2003 @ 05:20 AM EST
I just found an interesting article on eweek:
<a
href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1379146,00.asp">Ransom
Love Back In Linux With Progeny</a>

keanu

[ Reply to This | # ]

The Novell Letters
Authored by: aet on Tuesday, November 11 2003 @ 06:30 AM EST
PJ, the date in the first letter is "June 9, 2003" but your
post said "The first is dated June 6". Which one is
correct?

[ Reply to This | # ]

The Novell Letters
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 11 2003 @ 08:03 AM EST

"This letter is further to my letter of May 28, 2003 concerning SCO's
campaign directed against the Linux community. SCO's response to that letter
reinforces Novell's concerns."

A letter from May 28th? That's new. I'd love to see what SCO's response was.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )