decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
High Noon
Friday, July 18 2003 @ 03:56 PM EDT

There will be a SCO Teleconference at noon July 21, EDT. This is what they promise to talk about:
Latest developments in IBM lawsuit
Details about ownership of UNIX intellectual property, copyrights and opportunities for Linux customers
"Opportunities" for Linux customers? I think I can safely say that there are no Linux customers looking to SCO for opportunities. Perhaps they mean their own customers, who are likely seeking opportunities to escape.

David Boies will be there this time, along with the usual suspects.

US: 800-406-5356
Toll Call: 913-981-5572
Conference code #: 464644

A recorded replay of the teleconference will be made available 2-3 hours following the conference call and can be accessed by contacting Seth Oldfield at soldfiel at sco.com or by calling 801-932-5709.

Who is invited?

Press and industry analysts interested in UNIX and Linux intellectual property issues. Linux customers who wish to receive clarification from SCO on Linux use.

This is it. I'm only guessing, but judging from Linus' recent statements, I think they are going to back down as far as Linux is concerned. How much I don't know, but that is what I am expecting. Or maybe it's just hoping.

I guess it's my duty to show up, huh? Yup.

I would like to ask Boies about the GPL if they announce any licensing scheme. I don't know if they will let me attend, but I'll try. If not, I'll surely listen to the recording and report the news. If I don't make it, it won't be because I didn't try.

P.S. Infoworld reports that SCO's Blake Stowell is saying they will be announcing a licensing scheme, all right, sometime in the next month, but Monday will be just a taste of it. Illuminata analyst Gordon Haff says that while most Linux customers probably won't participate in a SCO licensing program, some companies might be willing to pay SCO to guarantee they would not be sued. SCO is "hoping that even if 99 percent of Linux customers laugh in their face, that there will be sufficient large companies who, for what is presumably going to be a relative drop in the bucket of their IT budgets, can potentially eliminate a cloud over their heads," he said.

Update:

Here's the press release:

********************

The SCO Group | Investor Relations | The SCO Group Teleconference, Monday, July 21, Noon EDT

The SCO Group Teleconference, Monday, July 21, Noon EDT

Jul 18, 2003

US: 800-406-5356 Toll Call: 913-981-5572 Conference code #: 464644

SCO to Provide Updates on IBM lawsuit, UNIX Ownership and Copyrights

What: SCO Teleconference: * Latest developments in IBM lawsuit * Details about ownership of UNIX intellectual property, copyrights and opportunities for Linux customers

Who: Darl McBride, President & CEO, The SCO Group Chris Sontag, Senior Vice President, SCOsource, The SCO Group David Boies, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP

The SCO Group (Nasdaq: SCOX), the owner of the UNIX operating system, helps millions of customers in more than 82 countries to grow their businesses. Headquartered in Lindon, Utah, SCO has a worldwide network of more than 11,000 resellers and 8,000 developers. SCO Global Services provides reliable, localized support and services to all partners and customers. For more information on SCO products and services, visit http://www.sco.com

Where: US: 800-406-5356 Toll Call: 913-981-5572 Password: 464644

When: Monday, July 21, 2003 Noon EDT

Who: Press and industry analysts interested in UNIX and Linux intellectual property issues. Linux customers who wish to receive clarification from SCO on Linux use.

Note: A recorded replay of the teleconference will be made available 2-3 hours following the conference call and can be accessed by contacting Seth Oldfield at soldfiel@sco.com or by calling 801-932-5709.


  


High Noon | 4 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
radiocomment
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 18 2003 @ 03:04 PM EDT
I don't know what their definition of a Linux customer is. If it meant any one who use Linux, free or purchased copy, I would be tuned in for the event.

I hope there will be lots of interesting questions to SCO.


Quan

[ Reply to This | # ]

radiocomment
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 18 2003 @ 03:22 PM EDT
I'm guessing they mean their own customers, the ones who received the letters
about copyright. But, since they didn't actually specify, it doesn't hurt to
call. They are free to say no.
pj

[ Reply to This | # ]

radiocomment
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 18 2003 @ 09:34 PM EDT
It looks like SCO is going to introduce the Linux licensing scheme after all as reported by the InforWorld, http://www. infoworld.com/article/03/07/18/HNscolicense_1.html

Let see how many are stupid enough to pay them.


Quan

[ Reply to This | # ]

radiocomment
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 20 2003 @ 05:08 AM EDT
SCO's scheme will probably run along these lines: not selling a "Linux licence" per se, but a licence to use SCO's IP *within your organisation* in conjunction with GPL'ed software. Remember that mixing proprietary and GPL'ed code is not prevented by the GPL, provided you don't redistribute the result, so this sort of licence could be drafted in such a way that it didn't fatally conflict with the GPL. What SCO *can't* do is licence the kernel itself as has been made pretty clear on this and other sites.

This SCO licence could indeed be worded in such a way that it didn't make any allegations against the Linux kernel. That would be left unsaid.

SCO said a while back that they had no plans to sue Red Hat et al.; this makes sense since SCO cannot distribute the kernel themselves, except under the GPL. They *need* RH/SuSE etc to do the distribution for them, to create Linux users to whom they can try to sell their "IP Licence." SCO can't afford to sue a large player because they would be able to fight the case and force SCO to reveal the alledged IP, which would destroy SCO's revenue stream even if SCO was correct (since the infringing IP would be removed.)

In short I think this is the only scheme which has a chance of working for SCO, relying on that 1% of users to stump up their protection money- er, sorry, licence fees. (Don't expect to see even 1% levels of sales in jurisdictions where the loser pays legal costs.)

The danger for SCO is that this does give a large firm (IBM itself? Google?) the chance to publicly say "we're not buying this licence - if you think we're doing anything wrong, point out the infringement." and call SCO's bluff. Again, it must be stressed that SCO does not want its copyright infringement cases to actually come to court.


Dr Stupid

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )